Skip to main content

Are you on the right long-term path? Get a full financial assessment

Get a full financial assessment
← Back to S Definitions

Single security

Single Security

A single security refers to an investment composed solely of one type of financial asset, such as a single stock, bond, or fund. In the realm of Investment Analysis, focusing on a single security means an investor's entire capital is exposed to the fortunes and risks inherent to that specific asset. This approach stands in stark contrast to building a diversified investment portfolio by spreading investments across various assets, industries, or geographic regions.

History and Origin

Historically, before the widespread adoption of modern financial theories, investing in a single security or a few selected securities was a common practice. Investors often placed their capital into a company they knew well or believed had strong prospects, akin to "laying bets on stocks". The concept of systematic portfolio construction to manage risk was not yet prevalent. However, significant market events, such as the Wall Street Crash of 1929, underscored the severe dangers of concentrated holdings, as investors saw the market lose a substantial portion of its value. This historical volatility paved the way for the development of theories that emphasized risk mitigation through broader investment strategies. In the early 1950s, Harry Markowitz introduced Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) through his paper "Portfolio Selection," which revolutionized investment thinking by highlighting the importance of looking at a portfolio's overall risk and return rather than individual assets in isolation7, 8. MPT formally demonstrated that combining different kinds of financial assets could lead to less risk than owning only one type.

Key Takeaways

  • A single security investment exposes an investor's capital entirely to the specific risks of that one asset.
  • This approach offers the potential for high returns if the chosen security performs exceptionally well, but it equally carries the risk of substantial, even total, loss.
  • Concentrating investments in a single security eliminates the risk-reducing benefits typically associated with diversification.
  • The primary risks include unsystematic risk (company-specific risks) and high concentration risk.
  • Investors holding a single security position should possess a high risk tolerance and thoroughly understand the associated vulnerabilities.

Interpreting the Single Security

An investment in a single security means that an investor's financial outcome is directly tied to the performance of that individual asset. There is no buffering effect from other holdings that might perform differently. For example, if the chosen single security is an equity (stock), its value will fluctuate based on the company's operational performance, industry trends, and broader market volatility. If the company faces a downturn, legal issues, or technological obsolescence, the value of the single security can decline sharply, directly impacting the entire investment. This contrasts sharply with a diversified approach where the poor performance of one asset might be offset by the strong performance of others.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor, Alex, who decides to put their entire $50,000 investment capital into a single security: 500 shares of TechCorp at $100 per share. Alex believes TechCorp is on the verge of a major breakthrough.

  • Scenario 1: TechCorp's Success. TechCorp announces a groundbreaking new product, and its stock price surges by 50% to $150 per share. Alex's investment grows to $75,000, representing a $25,000 gain. This scenario highlights the magnified potential for capital gains with a single security.
  • Scenario 2: TechCorp's Failure. The new product launch fails to gain traction, and TechCorp's stock price plummets by 50% to $50 per share. Alex's investment shrinks to $25,000, resulting in a $25,000 loss. This illustrates the amplified losses due to the lack of asset allocation and reliance on one company's fate.

In this example, Alex's entire investment rode the extreme highs and lows of a single company, showcasing the inherent all-or-nothing nature of a single security investment.

Practical Applications

While often discouraged for most retail investors, holding a single security or a highly concentrated position can occur in several real-world contexts:

  • Employee Stock Ownership: Employees, particularly executives, may accumulate a significant portion of their wealth in their employer's stock through stock options, grants, or purchase plans. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) provides investor bulletins specifically warning about the risks of investing heavily in an employer's stock due to lack of diversification. [SEC Investor Bulletin on Employer Stock].
  • Early-Stage Investing: Angel investors or venture capitalists often invest substantial sums into a single, unproven startup in anticipation of outsized returns, fully accepting the high risk of total loss.
  • Founder's Equity: Company founders naturally hold a single security position, as their personal wealth is often tied directly to their company's equity.
  • Inherited Shares: Individuals may inherit a large block of shares in a single company, leading to an unintended concentrated position.
  • Opportunistic Investing: Some investors intentionally take large, concentrated bets on a single security, believing they have unique insight or conviction in that particular asset's future performance. This strategy, though potentially lucrative, magnifies concentration risk6.

Even with potential high returns, financial professionals typically advise caution due to the severe implications of relying on one investment's performance5.

Limitations and Criticisms

The primary criticism of investing in a single security is the inherent and often uncompensated exposure to specific risks. When an investor holds only one security, their entire investment is subject to unsystematic risk – the risks specific to that company or industry, such as management errors, product failures, or regulatory changes. This type of risk can be largely mitigated through diversification, as the unique risks of one asset are offset by others in a portfolio.

Academic research, stemming from Modern Portfolio Theory, has consistently shown that adding different, imperfectly correlated assets to a portfolio reduces overall volatility without necessarily sacrificing expected returns. 4Holding a single security means missing out on these significant risk-reduction benefits. For instance, studies have found that a substantial percentage of individual stocks suffer "catastrophic declines," losing 70% or more of their value and never recovering, significantly underperforming the broader market. 2, 3The 1929 stock market crash serves as a historical testament to the devastating impact of widespread concentrated holdings, where lack of diversification contributed to immense wealth destruction. [NYT The Crash of 1929]. Even the Federal Reserve has highlighted the broad benefits of diversification in mitigating risks across various financial characteristics.
1

Single security vs. Diversification

The fundamental difference between a single security and diversification lies in risk management and portfolio construction.

FeatureSingle SecurityDiversification
Exposure100% to one assetSpread across multiple assets, asset classes, or regions
Risk ProfileHigh unsystematic risk; high concentration riskReduced unsystematic risk; mitigated concentration risk
Return PotentialMagnified gains (or losses)Smoother, potentially more consistent returns
Volatility ImpactDirect and amplifiedDampened by offsetting asset movements
GoalMaximize returns from a single, high-conviction betOptimize risk-adjusted returns and achieve long-term financial planning goals

While a single security offers the allure of outsized returns if it performs exceptionally well, diversification aims to achieve a more stable return profile by reducing the impact of any single asset's poor performance. Most financial experts recommend diversification as a cornerstone of prudent investing. [FRBSF The Benefits of Diversification].

FAQs

Q1: Is investing in a single security ever a good idea?

For most individual investors, especially those with limited capital or who prioritize capital preservation, investing in a single security is generally not recommended due to the extremely high concentration risk. However, for sophisticated investors with deep knowledge, significant capital, and a high risk tolerance, a concentrated bet on a single security might align with their specific strategy, though it does not guarantee success.

Q2: What kind of risk is most prominent when holding a single security?

The most prominent risk is unsystematic risk, also known as specific risk or idiosyncratic risk. This refers to the risk unique to a particular company or asset, such as a labor strike, product recall, or poor management decisions. Unlike systematic risk (market risk), unsystematic risk can largely be mitigated through diversification.

Q3: How many stocks do I need to be diversified?

While there's no magic number, academic studies suggest that holding approximately 20-30 well-chosen, non-highly correlated stocks can significantly reduce unsystematic risk. For broader diversification, investors often combine various asset classes, such as stocks, bonds, and real estate, rather than just individual stocks.

Q4: Can I lose all my money if I invest in a single security?

Yes, it is possible to lose all, or nearly all, of your investment if you hold only a single security and the issuing company goes bankrupt or its value plummets. Unlike diversified portfolios where losses in one asset might be offset by gains in others, a single security offers no such buffer.

AI Financial Advisor

Get personalized investment advice

  • AI-powered portfolio analysis
  • Smart rebalancing recommendations
  • Risk assessment & management
  • Tax-efficient strategies

Used by 30,000+ investors