Sortino verhaltnis

What Is Sortino Ratio?

The Sortino ratio is a key metric in the field of portfolio performance measurement, falling under the broader category of risk-adjusted return metrics. It measures the excess return of an investment per unit of downside deviation. Unlike other traditional risk-adjusted measures that consider both upward and downward volatility as "risk," the Sortino ratio focuses exclusively on harmful volatility—the fluctuations that fall below a specific target or required rate of return. This makes it particularly useful for investors primarily concerned with capital preservation and minimizing losses.

History and Origin

The Sortino ratio was developed by Frank A. Sortino in the early 1980s. Dr. Sortino, alongside Robert van der Meer, formalized the concept of "downside risk" in their 1991 paper published in the Journal of Portfolio Management. Their work highlighted that not all volatility is undesirable; investors generally welcome positive deviations in returns, while negative deviations represent true risk. The Sortino ratio emerged as a refinement to existing measures, providing a more intuitive assessment of an investment strategy's efficiency by penalizing only those returns that fall below an investor's target return.
⁹

Key Takeaways

• The Sortino ratio assesses the risk-adjusted return of an investment.
• It differentiates between "good" (upside) and "bad" (downside) volatility.
• Only returns falling below a specified target or required rate are considered in the risk calculation.
• A higher Sortino ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance.
• It is particularly relevant for investors focused on minimizing losses and capital preservation.

Formula and Calculation

The Sortino ratio is calculated using the following formula:

Where:

• (R_p) = Portfolio's actual or average return
• (R_T) = Target or required rate of return (often the risk-free rate, but can be any minimum acceptable return)
• (\sigma_D) = Downside deviation, which is the standard deviation of only the returns that fall below the target return ((R_T)).

To calculate downside deviation, only the returns below (R_T) are considered. The squared differences from (R_T) are summed, divided by the number of observations, and then the square root is taken. Positive deviations or returns above (R_T) are excluded from this calculation, reinforcing the ratio's focus on adverse volatility.

Interpreting the Sortino Ratio

Interpreting the Sortino ratio is straightforward: a higher ratio is generally preferred, as it signifies a greater excess return for each unit of downside risk taken. For instance, an investment with a Sortino ratio of 2.0 suggests that for every unit of "bad" volatility, it generates twice the excess return.

While there are no universal benchmarks, typical interpretations suggest:

• Less than 0: Not acceptable.
• 0.00 – 1.00: Suboptimal.
• Above 1.00: Good.
• Above 2.00: Very good.
• Above 3.00: Excellent.

It⁸ provides a more nuanced view of performance, especially for strategies where positive return distribution skewness is desirable, as it does not penalize gains that increase overall volatility.

Hypothetical Example

Consider two hypothetical investment portfolios, Portfolio Alpha and Portfolio Beta, over a year, both with an average annual return of 10%. Assume the target return (risk-free rate) is 3%.

Portfolio Alpha:

• Returns: {15%, 12%, 8%, 5%, 0%, -2%, -5%}
• Returns below target (3%): {0%, -2%, -5%}
• Downside Deviation ((\sigma_D)): Let's assume it's calculated to be 3.5%.

Sortino Ratio (Alpha) = (10% - 3%) / 3.5% = 7% / 3.5% = 2.0

Portfolio Beta:

• Returns: {20%, 10%, 7%, 2%, -1%, -3%, -8%}
• Returns below target (3%): {2%, -1%, -3%, -8%}
• Downside Deviation ((\sigma_D)): Let's assume it's calculated to be 6.0%.

Sortino Ratio (Beta) = (10% - 3%) / 6.0% = 7% / 6.0% (\approx) 1.17

Even though both portfolios yielded the same average return, Portfolio Alpha has a higher Sortino ratio (2.0 vs. 1.17). This indicates that Portfolio Alpha achieved its return with less exposure to detrimental downside volatility, making it the more efficient choice based on this metric. This distinction is crucial for evaluating strategies, particularly in asset allocation decisions.

Practical Applications

The Sortino ratio is a valuable tool for various participants in the financial markets, including asset managers, individual investors, and financial analysts. It is frequently used in the following contexts:

• Hedge Fund Evaluation: Hedge funds and other alternative investments often have asymmetric return profiles, where large positive returns can inflate overall standard deviation. The Sortino ratio provides a more accurate assessment of their performance by focusing solely on downside risk, which is critical for their capital preservation mandates.
• ⁷ Risk-Averse Investing: Investors with a low tolerance for losses or those with short investment horizons find the Sortino ratio particularly helpful. It quantifies how well an investment avoids significant drawdowns, aligning with their primary objective of protecting capital.
• ⁶ Portfolio Comparison: When comparing different investment vehicles or managers, the Sortino ratio allows for a direct comparison of how efficiently they generate returns while minimizing adverse deviations below a predefined acceptable threshold. This helps in making informed decisions about which investment provides a better return for the "bad" risk taken.
• Performance Attribution: It can complement other performance measures, offering insights into the sources of a portfolio's returns and the types of risks it has assumed. For instance, understanding why certain investments exhibit higher downside deviation can lead to adjustments in an investment strategy.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its advantages, the Sortino ratio has certain limitations that users should consider:

• Historical Data Reliance: Like many performance metrics, the Sortino ratio relies on historical data. Past performance is not an indicator or guarantee of future results, and market conditions can change, impacting future downside deviation.
• ⁵ Target Return Selection: The choice of the target return can significantly influence the calculated ratio. Using a higher or lower target can alter the perceived downside risk and, consequently, the ratio's value. Inconsistent target rates across different analyses can hinder meaningful comparisons.
• Not a Complete Risk Measure: While it improves upon measures like the Sharpe ratio by focusing on downside risk, the Sortino ratio is not a comprehensive measure of all risks. It does not capture other forms of risk, such as liquidity risk, credit risk, or operational risk, which are also crucial for a complete risk assessment.
• Potential for "Cherry-Picking": Because there are various performance metrics, there's a possibility that fund managers might strategically present the Sortino ratio if it highlights their performance more favorably than other metrics, especially if it has a weak correlation with other ratios like the Sharpe or Treynor ratios. In⁴vestors should always consider a suite of metrics for a holistic view of capital market investments.

Sortino Ratio vs. Sharpe Ratio

The Sortino ratio is often compared to the Sharpe ratio, another prominent measure of risk-adjusted return. While both metrics aim to evaluate how well an investment's returns compensate for its risk, their definition of risk differs fundamentally.

The main point of confusion arises because both ratios incorporate excess return and a measure of volatility. However, the Sortino ratio distinguishes itself by recognizing that investors are generally indifferent to or pleased with upside volatility, reserving its penalty only for harmful deviations below a chosen threshold. This makes the Sortino ratio a more intuitive measure for investors who prioritize avoiding significant drawdowns.

FAQs

Q: Why is the Sortino ratio considered better than the Sharpe ratio by some?
A: The Sortino ratio is considered better by some because it only penalizes downside volatility, aligning more closely with an investor's natural aversion to losses. The Sharpe ratio penalizes all volatility, including desirable upward movements in returns, which can misrepresent the efficiency of certain strategies.

³Q: What is a "good" Sortino ratio?
A: Generally, a Sortino ratio above 1.0 is considered good. A ratio above 2.0 is very good, and above 3.0 is excellent, indicating that the investment is generating substantial excess return for the downside risk it incurs.

²Q: Can the Sortino ratio be negative?
A: Yes, the Sortino ratio can be negative if the portfolio's average return is less than the target return. A negative ratio suggests that the investment is not even meeting the minimum acceptable return, let alone compensating for its downside risk.

Q: Is the Sortino ratio applicable to all types of investments?
A: The Sortino ratio is most valuable for investments where downside risk is a primary concern, such as hedge funds or strategies focused on capital preservation. While it can be calculated for various assets, its insights are particularly strong for those with non-normally distributed returns, where total volatility (as used by the Sharpe ratio) might be misleading.

¹Q: How does the choice of target return impact the Sortino ratio?
A: The choice of target return directly affects both the numerator (excess return) and the denominator (downside deviation) of the Sortino ratio. A higher target return will typically result in a lower Sortino ratio, as it implies more returns falling below the threshold and thus contributing to downside deviation. Conversely, a lower target return may yield a higher ratio. Consistency in the target return used is crucial for meaningful comparisons between different investments.