Tacit knowledge

What Is Tacit Knowledge?

Tacit knowledge refers to the unarticulated, experience-based insights and skills held by individuals that are difficult to transfer through written or formal means. It is often described as "knowing how" rather than "knowing what," encompassing intuition, personal wisdom, and practical skills gained through direct experience and interaction²⁸, ²⁹. In the broader context of [Knowledge Management], tacit knowledge represents a significant portion of an organization's [Human Capital] and is crucial for maintaining a [Competitive Advantage]. This form of knowledge is deeply personal, context-specific, and contributes to effective [Problem-solving] and [Decision-making] within various professional domains.

History and Origin

The concept of tacit knowledge was introduced by Hungarian-British scientist and philosopher Michael Polanyi in his 1958 work Personal Knowledge and further elaborated in his 1966 book, The Tacit Dimension. Polanyi famously posited that "we can know more than we can tell," highlighting that a significant part of human understanding and skill operates below the level of conscious articulation²⁶, ²⁷. He argued against the then-dominant view that all valuable knowledge could be fully formalized or explicitly stated, emphasizing the crucial role of personal commitment, intuition, and experiential learning in the process of scientific discovery and other fields²⁴, ²⁵. For Polanyi, tacit knowledge serves as the indispensable foundation upon which explicit, codified knowledge is understood and applied²³.

Key Takeaways

• Tacit knowledge is personal, experience-based, and difficult to articulate or codify.
• It encompasses practical skills, intuition, and insights gained through "knowing how."
• This form of knowledge is crucial for innovation, problem-solving, and competitive advantage within organizations.
• Transferring tacit knowledge often relies on informal methods like [Mentorship], observation, and shared experiences.
• While challenging to manage, recognizing and leveraging tacit knowledge is vital for [Employee Development] and organizational resilience.

Interpreting Tacit Knowledge

Interpreting tacit knowledge involves recognizing its presence and understanding its impact on performance, even when it cannot be explicitly stated. Unlike readily documented [Explicit Knowledge], tacit knowledge is embedded in an individual's actions, judgments, and understanding of complex situations. For an investor, for instance, it might be the intuitive sense of market sentiment that comes from years of trading, or the ability to identify subtle cues in a business negotiation. This "feel" for a situation, developed through repeated exposure and learning, enables faster [Decision-making] and more nuanced responses than a purely rules-based approach might allow. Organizations seek to leverage this deep-seated expertise by fostering environments that encourage its implicit transfer and application, often through collaborative projects and hands-on learning, which contribute to the collective [Organizational Culture].

Hypothetical Example

Consider a seasoned portfolio manager, Alex, who has managed a diversified fund for 20 years. While Alex can articulate their investment philosophy and the quantitative models used (explicit knowledge), a significant part of their success stems from tacit knowledge. For example, Alex might have an almost instinctive ability to sense when a market downturn is imminent, based on a combination of subtle economic indicators, geopolitical news, and even the "tone" of analyst reports that a less experienced manager might miss.

One day, a junior analyst, Ben, asks Alex why they decided to significantly reduce exposure to a particular sector before a sudden correction. Alex explains the quantitative factors and recent news, but also mentions a "gut feeling"—a complex synthesis of unarticulated patterns, past experiences, and subconscious risk assessment that isn't reducible to a simple formula. Alex might encourage Ben to shadow them during various market cycles, attend earnings calls, and participate in client meetings, allowing Ben to observe and implicitly absorb the nuanced [Risk Management] and [Strategic Planning] skills that constitute Alex's tacit knowledge. This informal learning process helps Ben build his own experiential foundation, accelerating his personal [Learning Curve].

Practical Applications

Tacit knowledge is highly valued in various real-world financial and business settings, often underpinning superior performance. In investment banking, senior dealmakers possess tacit knowledge about client relationships, negotiation tactics, and market timing that cannot be fully captured in training manuals. Similarly, experienced traders develop an intuitive sense for market patterns and liquidity dynamics, enabling them to execute complex trades effectively.
²²
In [Due Diligence] processes for mergers and acquisitions, the ability of an analyst to "read between the lines" of financial statements or assess the true operational health of a target company often relies on years of practical experience and accumulated tacit insights, rather than just explicit data. ²¹Organizations frequently implement programs like job rotations, mentorship initiatives, and "communities of practice" to facilitate the transfer of tacit knowledge among employees. ¹⁹, ²⁰For example, a veteran financial planner might teach a new recruit not just the explicit rules of financial regulation, but also the nuanced art of building trust with clients and understanding their unspoken financial anxieties, a skill honed through countless client interactions. ¹⁸The Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Sloan School of Management highlights the importance of codifying tacit knowledge into explicit forms for wider dissemination within an organization's knowledge lifecycle, while acknowledging that a significant component often remains tacit.
¹⁷

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its acknowledged value, tacit knowledge presents significant limitations, primarily due to its inherent difficulty in articulation and transfer. A major criticism is the challenge of its capture and codification, making it difficult to scale and share across an organization. ¹⁶When key individuals with significant tacit knowledge leave a company, this valuable [Intellectual Property] can be lost, posing a substantial risk to continuity and institutional memory.
¹⁵
Another challenge lies in validating or formally assessing tacit knowledge, as it often relies on subjective interpretation and experiential learning rather than objective metrics. ¹⁴This can lead to inconsistencies or a lack of standardized practices, especially in regulated environments where clear, documented procedures are paramount. The difficulty in expressing tacit knowledge explicitly can also hinder effective [Innovation] if insights cannot be adequately shared to build upon collectively. ¹², ¹³For example, the nuances of an expert's decision-making process, while effective, might be impossible to fully document, making it challenging to replicate or teach to others systematically. ¹¹This "unspecifiable" nature of tacit knowledge, as Polanyi noted, means that even attempts to convert it to explicit knowledge may only capture a partial understanding, leaving a significant, unarticulated component still at play.
⁹, ¹⁰

Tacit Knowledge vs. Explicit Knowledge

The distinction between tacit knowledge and [Explicit Knowledge] is fundamental in knowledge management.

While explicit knowledge is readily captured in reports, spreadsheets, and training materials, tacit knowledge resides in an individual's mind and is gained through years of practical application and unconscious learning. Confusion often arises because the two are intertwined; explicit knowledge requires tacit understanding for its effective application. For example, a financial analyst might have explicit knowledge of complex valuation models, but their tacit knowledge, built from practical experience, allows them to interpret model outputs, identify underlying assumptions, and make sound judgments in varying market conditions. The effective integration and leveraging of both types of knowledge are crucial for organizational success.

FAQs

What are common examples of tacit knowledge in a professional setting?

Common examples include a salesperson's ability to read a client's unspoken cues, a chef's intuitive sense of flavor balance, a doctor's diagnostic "hunch," or a seasoned programmer's knack for debugging complex code. ⁷, ⁸In finance, it might be a fund manager's "gut feeling" about market direction or a loan officer's instinct about a borrower's creditworthiness beyond their financial statements.

Can tacit knowledge be documented?

While tacit knowledge is inherently difficult to document fully, some aspects can be partially converted into explicit forms through various techniques. This might involve structured interviews with experts, storytelling sessions, video recordings of processes, or the creation of detailed case studies. ⁵, ⁶However, the subjective, nuanced, and intuitive elements often remain uncapturable in their entirety.

Why is tacit knowledge important for businesses?

Tacit knowledge is vital because it drives [Innovation], enhances problem-solving capabilities, and fosters a unique competitive edge that cannot be easily replicated by competitors. ⁴It represents the deep expertise and practical wisdom that allows organizations to adapt, make effective decisions, and achieve sustained performance beyond what formal procedures or explicit data alone can provide.

How do organizations encourage the sharing of tacit knowledge?

Organizations encourage the sharing of tacit knowledge through informal interactions, [Mentorship] programs, apprenticeships, cross-functional teams, and communities of practice. ², ³Creating a culture of trust and collaboration, where employees feel safe to share their experiences and insights, is also critical for facilitating this transfer.¹