Tax cuts and jobs act: Meaning, Criticisms & Real-World Uses

What Is the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act?

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) is a significant piece of United States federal legislation enacted in late 2017 that fundamentally reformed the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. As a major overhaul of tax policy, it falls under the broader financial category of Fiscal Policy. The TCJA introduced sweeping changes affecting both individual and corporate taxation, aiming to simplify the tax code, reduce tax burdens, and stimulate economic activity. Key provisions included a substantial reduction in the Corporate Tax Rate, adjustments to Individual Income Tax rates and Tax Brackets, and modifications to various deductions and credits. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act became effective on January 1, 2018, with most individual provisions scheduled to expire at the end of 2025⁸¹, ⁸².

History and Origin

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Pub. L. 115–97) was signed into law by President Donald Trump on December 22, 2017, representing the most extensive reform of the U.S. tax system in over three decades. ⁸⁰The legislation originated in the House of Representatives as H.R. 1 and underwent significant debate and revision before its passage. A core objective was to reduce the statutory corporate tax rate, which at 35%, was among the highest in the industrialized world. ⁷⁸, ⁷⁹Proponents argued that a lower corporate rate would encourage domestic investment and job creation. The law also sought to simplify the tax filing process for individuals by significantly increasing the Standard Deduction and repealing many specific itemized deductions. ⁷⁶, ⁷⁷The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimated that the conference agreement for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would reduce federal revenue by approximately $1.46 trillion over a ten-year budget window. ⁷⁴, ⁷⁵For a detailed overview of the changes, the Legal Information Institute provides a comprehensive summary of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
⁷³

Key Takeaways

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was enacted in December 2017, significantly overhauling the U.S. federal tax system.
It permanently lowered the corporate income tax rate from a top rate of 35% to a flat 21%.
⁷¹, ⁷²* For individuals, the TCJA reduced marginal income tax rates across most brackets, increased the standard deduction, and expanded the Child Tax Credit, but eliminated personal exemptions.
⁶⁹, ⁷⁰* Most individual tax provisions of the TCJA are set to expire at the end of 2025.
⁶⁷, ⁶⁸* Analyses by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) projected the TCJA would add trillions to the national debt over the long term.
⁶⁴, ⁶⁵, ⁶⁶

Interpreting the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Interpreting the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act involves understanding its multifaceted impact on different taxpayer groups and the broader economy. For businesses, the reduction in the Corporate Tax Rate was a direct and permanent benefit, intended to boost investment and competitiveness. ⁶³The introduction of 100% Bonus Depreciation for certain assets also provided immediate tax savings for businesses making capital expenditures.
⁶¹, ⁶²
For individuals, the changes were more complex. While many saw lower tax liabilities due to reduced rates and a larger standard deduction, the elimination of personal exemptions and limitations on certain Itemized Deductions, such as the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap of $10,000, affected taxpayers differently depending on their income levels and geographic location. ⁵⁹, ⁶⁰The long-term economic effects of the TCJA have been a subject of ongoing debate, with some analyses suggesting modest impacts on overall Gross Domestic Product and investment, and a significant increase in the National Debt.
⁵⁶, ⁵⁷, ⁵⁸

Hypothetical Example

Consider a married couple, Sarah and Tom, filing jointly in 2018 under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Before the TCJA, they might have claimed personal exemptions for themselves and their two children, and potentially itemized deductions for significant mortgage interest and state income taxes.

Under the TCJA:

Their personal exemptions were eliminated.
The standard deduction for married couples filing jointly nearly doubled, from $12,700 in 2017 to $24,000 in 2018. ⁵⁵This might have meant they no longer benefited from itemizing deductions if their combined itemized deductions did not exceed the new, higher standard deduction.
Their federal income tax rates were generally lowered across their Tax Brackets.
The Child Tax Credit increased from $1,000 per child to $2,000 per child, with an expanded refundable portion.
⁵⁴
If Sarah and Tom's itemized deductions, including the new $10,000 SALT cap, totaled $20,000, they would opt for the $24,000 standard deduction under the TCJA, effectively lowering their taxable income by an additional $4,000 compared to itemizing. Coupled with lower tax rates and an increased child tax credit, their overall tax liability might have decreased despite the loss of personal exemptions. This example illustrates how the TCJA aimed to simplify tax filing for many by making the standard deduction more attractive than itemizing.

Practical Applications

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act had wide-ranging practical applications across various sectors of the economy and financial planning:

Corporate Strategy: Businesses experienced a permanent reduction in their Corporate Tax Rate to 21%, which impacted investment decisions, capital allocation, and repatriation of foreign earnings. ⁵², ⁵³Companies considered increased share buybacks and dividends due to enhanced cash flow.
⁵¹* Individual Tax Planning: Individuals adjusted their tax strategies based on the increased Standard Deduction, changes in Tax Brackets, and the $10,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. ⁴⁹, ⁵⁰Many taxpayers who previously itemized found it more advantageous to take the standard deduction.
Investment Decisions: Changes to corporate taxation and immediate expensing rules (also known as Bonus Depreciation) could influence business investment in equipment and property. ⁴⁷, ⁴⁸For investors, modifications to the tax treatment of Capital Gains and dividends also played a role in portfolio decisions.
⁴⁶* Estate Planning: The TCJA significantly increased the estate tax exemption, impacting estate planning for high-net-worth individuals, though this provision is also scheduled to expire.
⁴⁴, ⁴⁵* Economic Impact Assessments: The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was intended to spur Economic Growth and investment. However, analyses, such as those by the Tax Policy Center, provided a range of conclusions regarding its actual economic effects, with some indicating modest impacts on GDP and questions about long-term investment boosts.
⁴³

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its intended benefits, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act faced several limitations and criticisms:

Increased Fiscal Deficit and National Debt: One of the most significant criticisms is the TCJA's impact on the federal budget. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) projected that the law would substantially increase federal budget deficits and contribute to the National Debt. ⁴¹, ⁴²For instance, conventional estimates cited by the Tax Policy Center indicated the TCJA would increase deficits by about $1.5 trillion over 10 years. ⁴⁰Longer-term projections suggested even greater increases if individual provisions are extended.
³⁹* Disproportionate Benefits to High-Income Earners: Critics argued that the benefits of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act were heavily skewed towards corporations and high-income households. While most households saw some tax reduction, the largest average tax cuts in dollar terms went to the wealthiest taxpayers. ³⁶, ³⁷, ³⁸The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities noted that in 2025, households in the top 1 percent would receive an average tax cut significantly larger than those in the middle or lowest quintiles.
³⁵* Modest Economic Growth Impact: While proponents anticipated a significant boost to Economic Growth and corporate investment, some studies and analyses, including those from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Congressional Research Service, found that the effects on economic output and median wages were smaller than expected or modest at best. ³³, ³⁴For example, research suggested that a large portion of increased corporate cash flow went towards share buybacks and dividends rather than capital expenditure or research and development.
³²* Complexity and Sunset Provisions: Although the TCJA aimed to simplify the tax code, it introduced new complexities, particularly for businesses and those navigating the Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction for Pass-through Income. ²⁹, ³⁰, ³¹Furthermore, the temporary nature of most individual provisions, scheduled to expire after 2025, creates uncertainty for future tax planning and revenue projections.
²⁸

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act vs. Tax Reform Act of 1986

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 and the Tax Reform Act of 1986 are both landmark pieces of tax legislation, but they differed significantly in their primary focus and lasting impact.

Feature	Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (2017)	Tax Reform Act of 1986
Primary Goal	Substantially reduce corporate tax rates (permanently) and offer broad tax relief to individuals (mostly temporarily), aiming to stimulate economic growth. ²⁶, ²⁷	Broaden the tax base and lower marginal rates, aiming for revenue neutrality and greater fairness by eliminating many loopholes and deductions. ²⁵
Corporate Tax Rate	Reduced the top corporate rate from 35% to a flat 21%. ²⁴	Reduced the top corporate rate from 46% to 34%. ²³
Individual Tax Rates	Maintained seven Tax Brackets but generally lowered rates across most income levels; these changes are largely temporary. ²⁰, ²¹, ²²	Reduced the number of individual tax brackets significantly (from 14 to 2, then 3), with a top rate of 28%; these changes were largely permanent at the time.
Standard/Itemized Deductions	Nearly doubled the Standard Deduction and eliminated many Itemized Deductions, including the $10,000 cap on state and local taxes (SALT). ¹⁸, ¹⁹	Eliminated many itemized deductions and expanded the standard deduction, aiming to simplify filing for most Americans by making itemizing less common.
Revenue Impact	Projected to significantly increase the Fiscal Deficit and national debt due to substantial revenue loss. ¹⁶, ¹⁷	Designed to be largely revenue-neutral, meaning it did not intend to significantly increase or decrease overall tax revenue.
Longevity of Provisions	Most individual provisions are temporary and expire at the end of 2025, while the corporate rate cut is permanent. ¹⁴, ¹⁵	Most provisions were permanent.

While the TCJA focused on tax cuts to spur growth, the 1986 act emphasized base broadening and rate reduction for perceived fairness and efficiency. The temporary nature of many TCJA provisions distinguishes it significantly from the more enduring changes of the 1986 reform.

FAQs

What were the main goals of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act?

The primary goals of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act were to lower federal income taxes for businesses and individuals, simplify the tax code by increasing the Standard Deduction, and stimulate economic activity through reduced tax burdens on corporations.
¹³

How did the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act affect individuals?

For individuals, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act generally lowered marginal tax rates across most Tax Brackets, nearly doubled the standard deduction, and expanded the Child Tax Credit. However, it also eliminated personal exemptions and placed a $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local taxes (SALT). ¹¹, ¹²Most of these individual provisions are scheduled to expire at the end of 2025.
¹⁰

What was the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on corporate taxes?

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanently reduced the top federal Corporate Tax Rate from 35% to a flat 21%. ⁹It also introduced new international tax rules and allowed businesses to fully deduct the cost of qualified new investments in the year they were made, known as 100% Bonus Depreciation.
⁷, ⁸

Did the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act pay for itself through economic growth?

Most analyses by non-partisan organizations, such as the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), concluded that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act did not generate enough Economic Growth to offset its cost. They projected that the law would add trillions to the federal National Debt over the long term.
⁴, ⁵, ⁶

Are the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent?

No, only the reduction in the corporate tax rate is permanent. ², ³The majority of the individual income tax provisions, including changes to tax rates, deductions, and credits, are temporary and are scheduled to revert to pre-TCJA law after December 31, 2025.¹