Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to A Definitions

Acquired oas option adjusted spread

LINK_POOL:

What Is Acquired OAS (Option-Adjusted Spread)?

Acquired OAS (Option-Adjusted Spread) is a financial metric used in fixed-income securities analysis, particularly for bonds that include embedded options. It quantifies the yield spread over a risk-free rate, adjusted to account for the impact of these options. Option-adjusted spread is considered a more precise measure of a bond's yield and associated risks than simpler yield calculations, falling under the broader category of fixed-income analysis. It helps investors assess the true value of a bond by isolating its credit risk from the influence of its embedded options74.

The Option-Adjusted Spread (OAS) is typically expressed in basis points (bps) and represents the additional yield an investor receives for assuming the bond's credit risk, while also factoring in the effects of options like call or put provisions73. By adjusting for these features, the OAS provides a more accurate reflection of the bond's associated risks, particularly its credit risk72. It is important in comparing bonds with varying optionality, as it considers how these embedded options can change future cash flows and the bond's overall value.

History and Origin

The concept of Option-Adjusted Spread (OAS) emerged as financial markets grew in complexity, particularly with the proliferation of bonds featuring embedded options such as callable bonds and Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS). Traditional yield measures, such as yield to maturity, proved inadequate for these instruments because they did not account for the uncertain cash flows introduced by embedded options71.

The need for a more sophisticated valuation tool became apparent with the rise of the securitization market. For instance, Mortgage-Backed Securities, which gained prominence after the issuance of the first agency MBS pool by Ginnie Mae in 1970, are inherently complex due to the prepayment risk of underlying mortgages70. Homeowners have the right to prepay their mortgages, which affects the cash flows of MBS. This introduced significant uncertainty, making it challenging to compare MBS with traditional bonds or even other MBS with different prepayment characteristics.

To address this, financial engineers and quantitative analysts developed models that could simulate various interest rate scenarios and, importantly, the likely behavior of embedded options within those scenarios. The OAS was conceived as a dynamic pricing model that incorporates interest rate volatility and prepayment rates to determine a spread that, when added to a benchmark yield curve, equates the theoretical price of a bond to its market price. This allowed for a more "arbitrage-free" valuation framework, even though true arbitrage is difficult to achieve due to uncertain cash flow timing and liquidity factors69.

Key Takeaways

  • The Option-Adjusted Spread (OAS) measures the yield difference between a bond with an embedded option and a risk-free rate, adjusted for the option's value68.
  • OAS is a crucial metric for evaluating bonds with embedded options, such as callable bonds or Mortgage-Backed Securities, as it accounts for the potential changes in cash flows due to these options.
  • Unlike the Z-spread, OAS considers how embedded options can influence a bond's future cash flows and its overall value.
  • A higher OAS generally suggests that a bond is potentially undervalued relative to comparable securities, while a lower OAS may indicate overvaluation67.
  • OAS calculations are model-dependent and rely on assumptions about interest rate volatility and prepayment rates, which can impact accuracy65, 66.

Formula and Calculation

The calculation of the Option-Adjusted Spread (OAS) is a complex process that typically involves sophisticated modeling techniques rather than a simple algebraic formula, due to the dynamic nature of embedded options. However, conceptually, OAS can be understood in relation to the Z-spread and the cost of the embedded option.

The fundamental relationship is expressed as:

OAS=Z-Spread−Option Cost\text{OAS} = \text{Z-Spread} - \text{Option Cost}

Where:

  • OAS is the Option-Adjusted Spread, representing the compensation for credit and liquidity risks, after accounting for the option64.
  • Z-Spread (Zero-Volatility Spread) is the constant spread that, when added to the default-free spot yield curve, makes the present value of a bond's cash flows equal to its market price, without considering embedded options62, 63.
  • Option Cost is the estimated value of the embedded option within the bond61. This value can be positive or negative depending on whether the option benefits the issuer (e.g., a callable bond) or the bondholder (e.g., a putable bond)60.

For a callable bond, where the issuer has the right to redeem the bond early, the option cost is positive because the option benefits the issuer. Consequently, the OAS for a callable bond will be lower than its Z-spread, reflecting the compensation investors forgo due to the call risk59. Conversely, for a putable bond, where the bondholder has the right to sell the bond back to the issuer, the option benefits the bondholder, making the option cost negative. In this case, the OAS will be higher than the Z-spread58.

The actual calculation of OAS involves a dynamic pricing model, often employing binomial interest rate trees or Monte Carlo simulations, to project a multitude of possible interest rate paths and corresponding cash flows57. These models account for interest rate volatility and, for securities like Mortgage-Backed Securities, prepayment risk. The OAS is the spread that, when added to the forward rates along each path, equates the bond's theoretical value to its current market price55, 56.

Interpreting the Acquired OAS (Option-Adjusted Spread)

Interpreting the Acquired OAS involves understanding its significance in evaluating a bond's relative value and risk-adjusted return. The Option-Adjusted Spread (OAS) provides a yield premium that compensates investors for risks beyond the risk-free rate, specifically after adjusting for the impact of any embedded options54.

A higher OAS for a given security generally indicates that it offers a greater return for the risks undertaken, making it potentially more attractive to investors53. Conversely, a lower OAS suggests a lower compensation for those risks. When comparing two bonds with similar credit quality and other characteristics, the bond with the higher OAS is typically considered to be relatively underpriced or "cheap," while the one with a lower OAS might be overpriced51, 52.

For example, if two Mortgage-Backed Securities have the same estimated maturity but different OAS values, the one with the higher OAS would likely be selling at a lower price and offer a greater potential return50. This is because the OAS isolates the credit and liquidity components of the spread by stripping out the option's influence, allowing for a more "apples-to-apples" comparison among bonds with varying embedded options48, 49.

It is important to note that a positive OAS implies a higher yield than a risk-free security, compensating investors for the additional risk47. While OAS is a valuable tool, it should be used in conjunction with other metrics and a comprehensive analysis of the security and market conditions, as its accuracy depends on the underlying assumptions and models used46.

Hypothetical Example

Consider two hypothetical corporate bonds, Bond A and Bond B, both with a face value of $1,000, a 5-year maturity, and similar credit ratings. Both bonds are currently trading at $980.

Bond A is a plain vanilla bond with no embedded options.
Bond B is a callable bond, meaning the issuer has the right to redeem it early at a preset price if interest rates fall significantly. This call provision introduces uncertainty for the investor, as their bond could be repaid earlier than expected, forcing reinvestment at a potentially lower rate.

To compare these two bonds accurately, an investor decides to calculate their Option-Adjusted Spreads (OAS).

First, they calculate the Z-spread for both bonds. Assume that, after performing the necessary calculations over the Treasury yield curve, the Z-spread for both bonds is determined to be 150 basis points.

Next, they need to determine the option cost for Bond B. Using a sophisticated bond pricing model that accounts for various interest rate volatility scenarios and the probability of Bond B being called, the option cost for Bond B is estimated to be 40 basis points. Bond A, having no embedded options, has an option cost of 0 basis points.

Now, apply the OAS formula:

For Bond A (no embedded option):
OAS = Z-Spread - Option Cost = 150 bps - 0 bps = 150 bps

For Bond B (callable bond):
OAS = Z-Spread - Option Cost = 150 bps - 40 bps = 110 bps

In this hypothetical example, even though both bonds have the same Z-spread, the OAS of Bond B (110 bps) is lower than that of Bond A (150 bps). This difference reflects the value of the embedded call option, which benefits the bond issuer. The lower OAS for Bond B indicates that, after accounting for the issuer's right to call the bond, the investor is effectively compensated less for the bond's credit and liquidity risks compared to a non-callable bond with similar characteristics. An investor seeking higher compensation for a given level of risk would likely prefer Bond A in this scenario, assuming all other factors are equal.

Practical Applications

The Acquired OAS (Option-Adjusted Spread) is a widely used metric in various areas of finance, especially where fixed-income securities with embedded options are prevalent. Its primary application lies in helping investors and portfolio managers make informed decisions by providing a more accurate assessment of a bond's value and risk.

One of the most significant applications of OAS is in the analysis of Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS). These securities carry significant prepayment risk due to homeowners' ability to refinance their mortgages when interest rates fall. OAS is crucial for valuing MBS because it quantifies the spread that compensates investors for this unpredictable prepayment behavior, allowing for a more meaningful comparison between different MBS or between MBS and other bond types. Firms like PIMCO actively utilize OAS in their analysis of MBS and other asset-backed finance instruments to measure risk and identify attractive investment opportunities43, 44, 45. The U.S. Federal Reserve, through its extensive holdings of agency MBS, also indirectly benefits from such valuation methodologies, as these securities form a substantial part of its balance sheet, influencing monetary policy actions41, 42.

OAS is also extensively used in the valuation and comparison of callable bonds and putable bonds40. Callable bonds, which can be redeemed by the issuer prior to maturity, present a reinvestment risk to investors38, 39. OAS helps quantify the compensation an investor receives for bearing this call risk, enabling them to determine if the higher yield offered by a callable bond is justified36, 37. Similarly, for putable bonds, which give the investor the right to sell the bond back to the issuer, OAS helps in assessing the value of this embedded option.

Beyond these specific bond types, OAS is vital for relative value analysis across diverse fixed-income instruments35. By adjusting for the complexities of embedded options, OAS allows for "apples-to-apples" comparisons of bonds with different features, aiding in portfolio allocation and risk management decisions33, 34. Public fund managers, for example, use OAS to compare callable bonds with non-callable alternatives to ensure their investment practices align with their objectives of safety, liquidity, and return32.

Limitations and Criticisms

While the Acquired OAS (Option-Adjusted Spread) offers a sophisticated approach to valuing fixed-income securities with embedded options, it is not without limitations and criticisms. Its primary drawback stems from its inherent reliance on complex models and the assumptions underpinning them30, 31.

One significant limitation is its model dependency29. The accuracy of the calculated OAS heavily relies on the quality and assumptions of the interest rate models (e.g., binomial trees, Monte Carlo simulations) used to project future interest rate paths and estimate the option cost28. Different models or even variations in inputs within the same model can yield different OAS values for the same bond, potentially leading to varied investment decisions26, 27. For instance, assumptions about interest rate volatility can significantly impact the calculated OAS, and using historical volatility data in a forward-looking model may not accurately capture future market dynamics or economic shifts25.

Another criticism revolves around the assumptions made regarding prepayment behavior, especially pertinent for Mortgage-Backed Securities. Prepayment models, which are crucial for projecting cash flows in MBS, often rely on historical data, which may not adequately predict future borrower behavior during changing economic conditions24. This can lead to inaccuracies in the estimated option cost and, consequently, the OAS23.

Furthermore, the OAS typically focuses on interest rate risk and prepayment risk but may not fully account for all potential risks, such as credit risk or liquidity risk, in a comprehensive manner22. While it aims to isolate the credit spread, some argue that aspects like default options are often ignored in the calculation, potentially presenting an incomplete picture of the security's overall risk21.

Finally, the complexity of OAS calculations can lead to difficulties in interpretation for less experienced investors20. The dynamic nature of OAS, responding to changes in the yield curve, volatility, and credit spreads, means that its value is constantly shifting, which can distort the perceived behavior of securities if not understood thoroughly19. Therefore, while OAS is a powerful analytical tool, it should be used judiciously and in conjunction with other forms of fundamental and market analysis.

Acquired OAS (Option-Adjusted Spread) vs. Z-Spread

The Acquired OAS (Option-Adjusted Spread) and the Z-spread (Zero-Volatility Spread) are both crucial metrics for analyzing fixed-income securities, but they differ significantly in how they account for embedded options. Understanding this distinction is vital for accurate bond pricing and comparison.

The Z-spread is a constant spread that, when added to each point along a benchmark Treasury yield curve, makes the present value of a bond's cash flows equal to its market price18. It is considered a "static" spread because it does not adjust for any optionality within the bond. Essentially, the Z-spread provides the yield premium for all non-Treasury risks, including credit risk, liquidity risk, and, critically, any option risk if embedded options are present17.

In contrast, the Acquired OAS is the Z-spread adjusted for the value of any embedded options16. Its purpose is to strip out the influence of these options, providing a spread that compensates investors specifically for the bond's credit and liquidity risks, excluding the option's impact14, 15. This makes OAS a "dynamic" pricing model, as it accounts for how changes in interest rates and volatility might affect the exercise of embedded options and, consequently, the bond's cash flows.

The key difference lies in the treatment of the "option cost." For a callable bond, where the issuer has the right to buy back the bond, the call option benefits the issuer and has a positive value. Therefore, the OAS for a callable bond will be lower than its Z-spread, as the OAS effectively subtracts the option's value13. Conversely, for a putable bond, where the investor has the right to sell the bond back, the put option benefits the bondholder and has a negative value (or the option cost is viewed as a benefit to the investor). In this case, the OAS will be higher than the Z-spread12.

In summary, while the Z-spread gives a total spread over the risk-free curve including option risk, the Acquired OAS provides a more refined measure that isolates the spread attributable solely to the bond's underlying credit and liquidity characteristics, making it more suitable for comparing bonds with different embedded option features11.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of Acquired OAS?

The primary purpose of Acquired OAS (Option-Adjusted Spread) is to help investors accurately compare the relative value of fixed-income securities, particularly those with embedded options. It provides a measure of yield compensation for credit and liquidity risks, adjusted for the influence of any embedded call or put options10. This allows for a more "apples-to-apples" comparison between bonds that might otherwise appear similar based on nominal yields but have different option characteristics.

How does Acquired OAS account for interest rate volatility?

Acquired OAS explicitly accounts for interest rate volatility by using complex valuation models, such as binomial trees or Monte Carlo simulations9. These models simulate hundreds or thousands of potential future interest rate paths. Along each path, the model estimates the bond's cash flows, taking into account how the embedded option (e.g., a call or put) would likely be exercised at different interest rate levels. The OAS is then determined as the constant spread that, when added to the benchmark rates in each scenario, equates the average theoretical price of the bond to its current market price7, 8.

Is Acquired OAS relevant for all types of bonds?

No, Acquired OAS is most relevant and commonly used for bonds with embedded options, such as callable bonds, putable bonds, and Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS)6. For plain vanilla bonds that have no embedded options, the OAS will generally be very close to, or the same as, the Z-spread, as there is no option cost to adjust for5. Therefore, while it can technically be calculated for any bond, its unique value proposition is realized when analyzing securities where option features significantly impact cash flows and pricing.

What does a higher Acquired OAS indicate?

A higher Acquired OAS generally indicates that the bond is offering a greater yield compensation for its credit and liquidity risks, after stripping out the impact of embedded options4. This often suggests that the bond might be undervalued relative to comparable securities with lower OAS values3. Investors often look for higher OAS values when seeking potentially attractive investment opportunities, as it implies a better risk-adjusted return for the bond's underlying characteristics2.

Can Acquired OAS be negative?

Theoretically, Acquired OAS can be negative, although it is less common for bonds with positive credit risk. A negative OAS would imply that the market price of the bond is higher than its theoretical value, even after accounting for embedded options and the risk-free rate1. This could occur in unusual market conditions or if the embedded option significantly benefits the issuer to such an extent that it outweighs the bond's credit and liquidity spreads. However, a positive OAS is typically expected as compensation for the inherent credit risk and liquidity risk of the bond.