Design patent

What Is Design Patent?

A design patent is a form of intellectual property patent protection granted to the ornamental design of an article of manufacture. Unlike other forms of patent, a design patent specifically safeguards the non-functional, aesthetic appearance of a product rather than its utility or how it works. This legal instrument falls under the broader category of intellectual property within business finance, allowing creators to protect the unique visual characteristics of their inventions, such as a distinct shape, configuration, or surface ornamentation. Objects covered by a design patent can range widely, including the unique shape of a piece of furniture, the distinct look of a computer icon, or the overall form of electronic devices.

History and Origin

The concept of protecting industrial designs has roots in various jurisdictions, evolving alongside the industrial revolution to encourage innovation in product aesthetics. In the United States, the foundation for design patents was laid with the Patent Act of 1842. This legislation recognized the value in safeguarding the visual appeal of manufactured goods. The current legal framework for design patents in the U.S. is primarily codified under 35 U.S. Code § 171, which stipulates that "Whoever invents any new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.".⁷ This provision allows inventors to secure exclusive rights to their unique aesthetic creations. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is the federal agency responsible for granting these patents, examining applications to ensure designs are novel, original, and ornamental. The USPTO provides comprehensive guidance on the application process, outlining the specific requirements for drawings, specifications, and claims needed to secure a design patent.
⁶

Key Takeaways

• A design patent protects the ornamental (aesthetic) appearance of an article of manufacture, not its functional aspects.
• To be granted, a design must be new, original, and ornamental, and not dictated solely by its function.
• The term of a U.S. design patent is 15 years from the date of issue for applications filed on or after May 13, 2015, with no maintenance fees required.
• Design patent holders can seek remedies for infringement, including an infringer's total profits from the sale of an infringing article.
• The scope of protection is generally determined by the visual appearance as shown in the patent's drawings.

Interpreting the Design Patent

Interpreting the scope of a design patent largely revolves around visual comparison and the "ordinary observer test." This test, established by the U.S. Supreme Court, dictates that infringement occurs if, "in the eye of an ordinary observer, giving such attention as a purchaser usually gives, two designs are substantially the same." ⁵This means that a design patent is infringed if an average consumer would be deceived into believing an accused product is the patented design, without unusually careful effort.

When evaluating a design patent, examiners and courts consider its novelty and non-obviousness in light of existing prior art. The design must be new and not an obvious modification of previous designs to an ordinary designer in the field. Drawings are critical in a design patent application, as they define the scope of protection. Features shown in solid lines are protected, while those in broken lines are generally not. Understanding these visual cues is essential for both patentees and those seeking to avoid infringement.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine a startup, "ErgoTech," has developed a new ergonomic computer mouse. While the internal mechanics that make it ergonomic might be covered by a utility patent, ErgoTech's design team has created a unique, flowing shape for the mouse that is aesthetically distinctive and unlike any other mouse on the market. This unique contour and surface finish are what they wish to protect with a design patent.

ErgoTech files a design patent application with the USPTO, submitting detailed drawings showing multiple views of their mouse, highlighting its distinctive shape. If the patent is granted, ErgoTech gains exclusive rights to that specific ornamental design for 15 years. This provides them with a significant competitive advantage in the market.

Suppose a competitor, "CopyCorp," later releases a mouse that, while functionally different internally, has a shape and appearance so similar to ErgoTech's patented design that an average consumer would easily confuse the two. ErgoTech could then pursue a legal dispute against CopyCorp for design patent infringement, seeking to stop their sales and potentially claim damages based on CopyCorp's profits from the infringing product. This process underscores the role of design patents in protecting the visual identity developed during product development.

Practical Applications

Design patents are crucial tools for businesses seeking to protect their creative output and establish a strong market presence. They are widely used in industries where product appearance plays a significant role in consumer appeal and brand differentiation. For instance, in the technology sector, the unique shape of a smartphone, the layout of icons on a screen, or the design of a smart device can be protected by a design patent. This enables companies to build brand equity and prevent competitors from replicating the distinct look and feel of their offerings.

Beyond electronics, design patents find application in various fields, including fashion, automotive design, furniture, and consumer goods. Protecting a distinct bottle design for a beverage or the pattern on a textile can be vital for maintaining market share and securing investment. The ability to prevent others from manufacturing, using, or selling products with substantially similar designs provides patentees with a powerful means of control over their designs and the potential for revenue through royalties derived from licensing agreements.

A prominent example of the practical application and subsequent challenges of design patents is the extensive legal battle between Apple and Samsung over smartphone designs. Apple successfully sued Samsung for infringing on design patents related to features like the iPhone's rounded corners and icon arrangements. While initial verdicts awarded substantial damages, highlighting the importance of design patents, the case also brought to light complexities in determining damages for multi-component products where only a portion infringes.
⁴

Limitations and Criticisms

While design patents offer valuable protection, they come with certain limitations and are subject to criticism. A primary limitation is their narrow scope; a design patent protects only the ornamental appearance, not the underlying function or structural elements of an article. This distinction is critical, as a design dictated solely by its function is generally not eligible for protection. If the appearance is purely functional, with no alternative designs serving the same purpose, then it lacks the "ornamentality" required for a design patent.
³
Another criticism revolves around the difficulty of enforcement. Because design patents protect only the appearance, minor design modifications by competitors can sometimes be enough to avoid infringement, even if the overall impression remains somewhat similar. The "ordinary observer test" used to determine infringement can be subjective, leading to unpredictable outcomes in legal disputes. For example, proving that an accused design is "substantially the same" as the patented design, particularly when considering prior art, can be challenging in court.
²
Furthermore, calculating damages in design patent infringement cases, especially for multi-component products, can be complex. While the law allows for recovery of an infringer's total profits, determining the "article of manufacture" to which the infringed design applies can be difficult, particularly when the design is only a small component of a larger product. This was a key issue in the Apple v. Samsung litigation, where the Supreme Court ruled that the "article of manufacture" could be a component rather than the entire product, but did not provide clear guidance on how to define this in practice, leaving ambiguity in damages calculations.
¹

Design Patent vs. Utility Patent

The most common point of confusion arises when distinguishing a design patent from a utility patent. While both offer forms of patent protection, they serve fundamentally different purposes:

A design patent protects the aesthetic elements, ensuring that a product's unique visual identity cannot be copied. In contrast, a utility patent protects the functional aspects of an invention—its composition, process, machine, or manufacture. An article can potentially have both a design patent and a utility patent if it possesses both novel functional and ornamental characteristics. This dual protection strategy is sometimes employed to maximize asset protection and strengthen a company's position in market competition.

FAQs

Q1: How long does a U.S. design patent last?

A U.S. design patent issued from an application filed on or after May 13, 2015, lasts for 15 years from the date the patent is granted. Unlike utility patents, design patents do not require maintenance fees.

Q2: Can a design patent protect a logo?

Generally, a logo is better protected by a trademark, which protects brand names, symbols, and slogans used to identify and distinguish goods or services. While a design patent could theoretically protect a unique ornamental drawing, trademarks are specifically designed for brand identity.

Q3: What is the difference between a design patent and a copyright?

A design patent protects the ornamental design of a useful article, while a copyright protects original works of authorship, such as literary, dramatic, musical, and certain artistic works. Copyright applies to expressions, not utilitarian aspects of articles. For instance, a unique pattern printed on fabric might be covered by copyright, but the unique shape of the garment itself might be eligible for a design patent.

Q4: Can a design patent protect a graphical user interface (GUI)?

Yes, the ornamental design of a graphical user interface (GUI) or computer icon can be protected by a design patent. The USPTO has provided guidance on how computer-generated electronic images, when properly presented as an integral part of an article of manufacture (like a display screen), can qualify for design patent protection.

Q5: Why are design patents important for businesses?

Design patents are crucial for business growth because they allow companies to safeguard the unique aesthetic appeal of their products. This helps in building a distinct brand identity, differentiating products in a crowded market, and preventing competitors from copying visual elements that contribute to consumer appeal. Such protection can enhance a company's market value and discourage counterfeiting.