Skip to main content
← Back to F Definitions

Financial accounting standards board

  • [TERM]: Financial Accounting Standards Board
  • [RELATED_TERM]: International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)
  • [TERM_CATEGORY]: Accounting Standards
Hidden Internal LinkURL
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
Financial StatementsFinancial Statements
Public CompaniesPublic Companies
Private SectorPrivate Sector
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Financial ReportingFinancial Reporting
Balance SheetBalance Sheet
AssetsAssets
LiabilitiesLiabilities
EquityEquity
Fair Value AccountingFair Value Accounting
Historical CostHistorical Cost
RevenuesRevenues
ExpensesExpenses
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)

What Is the Financial Accounting Standards Board?

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is an independent, private-sector organization responsible for establishing and improving financial accounting and reporting standards in the United States. Its primary goal is to foster financial reporting that provides decision-useful information to investors and other users of financial reports, falling under the broader category of accounting standards. The FASB sets the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) that are followed by public companies, private companies, and not-for-profit organizations in the U.S.28 The work of the FASB ensures consistency and transparency in financial reporting, allowing stakeholders to make informed economic decisions.

History and Origin

The FASB was established in 1973, replacing the Accounting Principles Board (APB) of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).27 This transition aimed to create a more independent and robust standard-setting body. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) officially recognized the FASB as the authoritative organization for setting accounting standards for public companies in the U.S. in December 1973.26 This designation solidified the FASB's role in the private sector as the primary setter of U.S. GAAP. The establishment of the FASB was a response to a desire for greater public trust in financial reporting, building upon a foundation laid by acts such as the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.25

Key Takeaways

  • The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is the primary independent body that sets accounting standards (GAAP) in the United States.
  • Its mission is to improve financial reporting to provide useful information for investors and other users.24
  • The FASB operates under the oversight of the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF), which is responsible for funding, appointments, and performance review.22, 23
  • The FASB's output, known as the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), is the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP.
  • The FASB continuously updates and develops new standards to reflect changes in the business environment and promote international convergence where appropriate.20, 21

Interpreting the Financial Accounting Standards Board

The FASB's standards provide the framework for how companies prepare their financial statements, including the Balance Sheet, income statement, and statement of cash flows. Understanding the FASB's role is crucial for anyone analyzing financial data, as its pronouncements dictate how various transactions are recognized, measured, and presented. For instance, the FASB's Conceptual Framework provides fundamental concepts that guide the selection of transactions to be accounted for, how they should be recognized and measured, and how they should be summarized and reported.18, 19 This framework helps users of financial reporting information to better understand that information and its limitations.17 It defines key elements like assets, liabilities, and equity, and outlines qualitative characteristics such as relevance and representational faithfulness that financial information should possess.15, 16

Hypothetical Example

Consider a hypothetical technology startup, "InnovateTech," preparing its annual financial statements. Without the standards set by the FASB, InnovateTech might adopt its own arbitrary rules for recognizing revenues or expensing research and development costs. For example, they might decide to recognize all future subscription revenue upfront or defer all research and development expenses indefinitely.

However, because InnovateTech operates in the U.S., it must adhere to FASB's GAAP. This means InnovateTech follows specific guidelines, such as those related to revenue recognition (e.g., Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers) which mandate that revenue be recognized when goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration expected in exchange for those goods or services. Similarly, research and development costs are generally expensed as incurred under FASB standards, promoting conservatism and comparability. By following these FASB standards, InnovateTech's financial statements become comparable to other U.S. companies, allowing investors to assess its performance fairly.

Practical Applications

The FASB's influence is pervasive across financial markets and regulation. Its standards are fundamental to how financial transactions are recorded, impacting investment analysis, corporate finance, and regulatory oversight. For example, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) serves as the single authoritative source of U.S. GAAP.13, 14 This codification reorganizes thousands of accounting pronouncements into a consistent, easily accessible structure, making it simpler for accountants, auditors, and financial professionals to research specific accounting issues.

A notable area of practical application involves how companies recognize credit losses. The FASB recently updated guidance on the measurement of credit losses for accounts receivable and contract assets, aiming to reduce the effort needed for estimation while still providing useful information to investors.12 These updates directly impact how financial institutions and businesses assess and report their potential losses, which can influence their lending practices and overall financial health. The FASB's work directly underpins the integrity of financial reporting that stakeholders rely on for making decisions.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its crucial role, the FASB has faced criticisms. One prominent debate centers around Fair Value Accounting, particularly in the context of financial crises. During the 2008 financial crisis, some critics argued that FASB Statement 157, which required certain assets to be valued at their current market price (mark-to-market), exacerbated the crisis by forcing companies to record significant losses on illiquid assets, even if they intended to hold them long-term.11 While studies have concluded that fair value accounting played no significant role in causing the crisis, the debate highlighted concerns about its impact during periods of market illiquidity.9, 10

Another area of discussion involves the balance between strict rules and professional judgment in accounting. Critics sometimes argue that overly prescriptive standards can hinder companies from presenting the most economically relevant information in their financial statements. Furthermore, the FASB's process, while transparent, is subject to lobbying from various stakeholders, which can influence the direction and outcome of standard-setting projects.8 The ongoing effort to converge U.S. GAAP with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) also presents challenges, as different philosophical approaches to accounting can lead to disagreements and complexities in harmonization.

Financial Accounting Standards Board vs. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)

While both the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) are independent standard-setting bodies focused on improving financial reporting, they operate in different jurisdictions and issue different sets of accounting standards. The FASB is responsible for developing Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) used in the United States, whereas the IASB develops International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which are used in over 110 countries worldwide.7

The key difference lies in the authoritative standards they produce and their geographical scope. U.S. companies primarily adhere to FASB's GAAP, while many international companies follow IASB's IFRS. Although their standards differ, the FASB and IASB have historically collaborated on projects aimed at converging their respective accounting frameworks to enhance global comparability of financial statements. This collaboration, such as the Norwalk Agreement, seeks to reduce the differences between GAAP and IFRS, benefiting multinational corporations and global investors.

FAQs

What is the primary purpose of the Financial Accounting Standards Board?

The primary purpose of the FASB is to establish and improve financial accounting and reporting standards in the United States, ensuring that financial information is transparent, consistent, and useful for decision-making.6

Who oversees the FASB?

The Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF), an independent, private-sector, not-for-profit organization, supports and oversees the FASB. The FAF is responsible for funding, administering, and appointing members to the FASB.5

What are the standards set by the FASB called?

The standards set by the FASB are collectively known as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). These principles are compiled and presented in the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC).

Does the FASB set standards for governmental entities?

No, the FASB sets standards for non-governmental entities, including public companies, private companies, and not-for-profit organizations. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is responsible for setting accounting standards for state and local government entities in the U.S.3, 4

How does the FASB ensure its standards are relevant?

The FASB engages in a comprehensive and transparent process that includes public hearings, comment letters, and input from various advisory groups, such as the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council (FASAC) and the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF).1, 2 This inclusive approach helps the FASB gather diverse perspectives and ensure its standards address current financial reporting issues and remain relevant to users.