Skip to main content
← Back to G Definitions

Giffen goods

What Is Giffen Goods?

A Giffen good is a unique type of product in microeconomics and consumer behavior that defies the fundamental law of demand. Unlike most goods, where demand decreases as price increases, demand for a Giffen good actually rises when its price goes up, and falls when its price goes down. This unusual behavior results in an upward-slsloping demand curve for the good. Giffen goods are typically inferior goods that constitute a significant portion of a low-income household's budget and have very few, if any, close substitutes53. The counter-intuitive nature of a Giffen good arises when the negative income effect of a price increase outweighs the positive substitution effect.

History and Origin

The concept of Giffen goods is attributed to Scottish statistician and economist Sir Robert Giffen, who observed such purchasing habits among the poor in Victorian-era Britain51, 52. Alfred Marshall, a prominent economist, popularized the idea in his influential 1890 work, Principles of Economics, citing Giffen's observations regarding bread consumption. Marshall noted that if the price of bread, a staple food, increased significantly, poorer families might be forced to reduce their consumption of more expensive foods like meat and instead consume more bread, as it remained the cheapest available calorie source50.

While the "Irish potato famine" of the 1840s is often cited as a classic example, some economists have challenged its empirical validity as a true Giffen phenomenon, suggesting the issue was primarily a supply shortage due to crop failures rather than a demand response to price increases47, 48, 49. Nevertheless, the theoretical framework introduced by Giffen and Marshall highlighted a crucial exception to conventional economic theory.

Key Takeaways

  • A Giffen good is a non-luxury, often staple product, for which demand increases as its price rises, and decreases as its price falls46.
  • This phenomenon contradicts the standard law of demand, resulting in an upward-sloping demand curve.
  • Giffen goods are always inferior goods, meaning consumers buy less of them as their income increases44, 45.
  • The existence of Giffen goods requires two key conditions: the good must be an inferior good, and there must be a significant lack of close substitutes42, 43.
  • The unusual demand pattern for a Giffen good occurs because the negative income effect of a price increase outweighs the substitution effect41.

Interpreting the Giffen Goods

Understanding Giffen goods involves appreciating the interplay of income and substitution effects on consumer choices. When the price of a good increases, two primary forces act on consumer demand:

  1. Substitution Effect: Consumers tend to substitute the now more expensive good with relatively cheaper alternatives40.
  2. Income Effect: A price increase for a good reduces consumers' real purchasing power, making them effectively poorer39.

For a Giffen good, the income effect is so dominant and negative (because the good is inferior) that it overwhelms the substitution effect37, 38. For example, if a very poor household primarily consumes a cheap staple good and a small amount of a more expensive food, a sharp rise in the price of the staple good would significantly reduce their purchasing power. To maintain sufficient calories within their limited budget constraint, they might be forced to abandon the more expensive food entirely and increase their consumption of the now pricier staple, as it remains the most affordable option36. This illustrates how demand for the Giffen good rises despite its price increase.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a low-income household whose diet primarily consists of cheap rice (a staple food) and, occasionally, a small amount of chicken.

  • Initial Situation: Rice costs $0.50 per pound, and the household consumes 20 pounds of rice per week. Chicken costs $3.00 per pound, and they consume 1 pound per week. Their weekly food budget is $13.00. ($0.50 * 20 + $3.00 * 1 = $10 + $3 = $13).
  • Price Increase: The price of rice increases to $0.75 per pound due to a poor harvest.
  • Household Response: With their limited income, the household now finds that buying chicken even occasionally is too expensive given the higher rice price. They are forced to allocate a larger portion of their budget to rice. They reduce chicken consumption to zero and increase rice consumption to 22 pounds per week to meet their caloric needs.
  • Outcome: The household's total expenditure on rice is now $0.75 * 22 = $16.50. This exceeds their original $13.00 food budget, suggesting they would have to reallocate funds from other essential expenditures or be even more severely constrained. However, within the confines of Giffen theory, the key observation is that as the price of rice increased, the quantity demanded by the household also increased, demonstrating Giffen behavior. The household prioritized securing enough of the cheapest caloric source.

Practical Applications

The concept of Giffen goods, while theoretically important within microeconomics, has limited observable real-world examples, making practical applications challenging. However, understanding this rare phenomenon can offer insights into specific market dynamics and consumer responses, particularly in impoverished economies.

Empirical evidence for Giffen goods has been scarce, but a notable study by economists Robert Jensen and Nolan Miller provided compelling evidence in 2008. They conducted a field experiment in China, observing the consumption patterns of poor households. Their research suggested that rice in Hunan province and wheat in Gansu province exhibited Giffen behavior, where a subsidy (effectively lowering the price) led to a decrease in demand for these staples, and the removal of the subsidy (increasing the price) led to an increase in demand34, 35. This demonstrates how the principles of supply and demand can be inverted under very specific conditions for a Giffen good.

For policymakers, recognizing the potential for Giffen behavior in certain contexts, such as during food crises in low-income regions, can be crucial. It implies that simply subsidizing basic goods might not always lead to the expected increase in consumption or improvement in welfare if the conditions for a Giffen good are met. Instead, interventions might need to focus on increasing overall income or diversifying the availability of affordable staple goods to break the cycle of dependency on a single, inelastic commodity33.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its theoretical recognition, the existence of true Giffen goods in real-world markets is considered extremely rare and challenging to conclusively identify30, 31, 32. One of the primary criticisms stems from the limited empirical evidence supporting the phenomenon29. While some historical examples, like the Irish potato famine, have been proposed, they have often been debated and discredited as true Giffen cases due to other influencing factors such as supply shortages27, 28.

Economists find it difficult to isolate the pure income effect and substitution effect required to confirm Giffen behavior, as many other variables can influence consumer behavior and demand for goods25, 26. The definition of a Giffen good stipulates that only the good's price changes, not its perceived nature or quality. If a substantial price drop alters a consumer's perception of a good (e.g., it is no longer seen as exclusive), it would not qualify as a Giffen good but rather as a Veblen good.

Furthermore, the conditions required for a Giffen good to exist—namely, being a deeply inferior good with virtually no close substitutes and consuming a substantial portion of a poor consumer's budget—are very specific and not commonly met in diverse, modern economies. Th22, 23, 24e academic debate continues regarding the practical implications and widespread applicability of the Giffen good theory.

Giffen Goods vs. Veblen Goods

Giffen goods and Veblen goods are both anomalies to the standard law of demand, as their demand curves slope upward, meaning demand increases as price increases. Ho20, 21wever, the underlying reasons for this counter-intuitive behavior are fundamentally different.

FeatureGiffen GoodsVeblen Goods
Type of GoodTypically low-income, non-luxury, essential goods (e.g., staple foods like rice)Luxury, high-status, or premium goods (e.g., designer jewelry, high-end cars)
19 Primary DriverLack of affordable substitutes and significant portion of a poor consumer's budgetP17, 18erceived exclusivity, status, and quality associated with higher prices
16Income EffectStrong negative income effect outweighs the substitution effect 15
Consumer GroupLow-income consumers 12, 13Affluent consumers

The confusion between the two often arises because both exhibit an upward-sloping demand curve. Ho11wever, Giffen goods are driven by necessity and extreme budget constraints, forcing consumers to buy more of the cheap staple as prices rise because they cannot afford other alternatives. In10 contrast, Veblen goods are driven by prestige; their higher price is what makes them desirable as a symbol of status or exclusivity.

#9# FAQs

What are the conditions for a good to be considered a Giffen good?

For a product to be a Giffen good, it must meet three key conditions: it must be an inferior good (meaning demand falls as income rises), it must make up a substantial portion of the consumer's budget, and there must be very few, if any, close substitutes available.

#6, 7, 8## Why do Giffen goods defy the law of demand?
Giffen goods defy the law of demand because for these specific goods, the negative income effect of a price increase is stronger than the positive substitution effect. When the price of an essential, cheap good rises, low-income consumers feel poorer and are forced to cut back on other, more expensive items, leading them to consume more of the now relatively pricier, yet still cheapest, staple.

#5## Are Giffen goods common in the real world?
No, Giffen goods are considered very rare in the real world. While the theoretical concept is well-established in microeconomics, conclusive empirical evidence is limited, with only a few studies identifying specific instances under highly constrained conditions.

#2, 3, 4## How do Giffen goods relate to consumer utility?
Giffen goods present a paradox regarding utility maximization. While consumers generally seek to maximize satisfaction, for a Giffen good, the overwhelming necessity to meet basic needs due to limited income (the income effect) compels consumers to increase consumption even when the good becomes more expensive. This is not about increased satisfaction from the higher price, but rather a constrained choice to maintain subsistence.1