Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to K Definitions

Key employee

What Is Key Employee?

A Key Employee is a specific classification used primarily in the context of qualified retirement plans, particularly by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)) for purposes of [Retirement Plan Compliance]. This designation helps determine if a company's retirement plan, such as a 401(k) plans-plans) or defined benefit plans, disproportionately favors highly compensated individuals, which could lead to the plan being classified as "top-heavy plans". The classification criteria generally involve a combination of ownership percentages within the business and specific levels of compensation.

History and Origin

The concept of a Key Employee, as defined by the IRS, emerged as part of broader efforts to ensure equity and prevent discrimination in employer-sponsored retirement plans. Prior to formal regulations, executive compensation structures often allowed significant benefits to accrue to a select few at the top of an organization. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)) was a landmark federal law designed to protect employee retirement income and set minimum standards for most voluntarily established retirement and health plans in private industry.7

Over time, further IRS regulations, particularly those related to "top-heavy" plans, formalized the definition of a Key Employee to prevent retirement plans from unduly benefiting high-earning individuals without providing adequate contributions to other employees. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)) also plays a role in regulating executive compensation disclosure, ensuring transparency in how top executives are paid.6 This regulatory evolution reflects a sustained public and academic interest in the level and structure of executive compensation, often driven by concerns over fairness and the equitable distribution of wealth within corporations.5

Key Takeaways

  • A Key Employee is an IRS classification crucial for assessing whether retirement plans are "top-heavy."
  • This classification prevents retirement plans from disproportionately benefiting highly compensated individuals.
  • Criteria for Key Employee status include specific ownership percentages and salary thresholds.
  • Identification of Key Employees is vital for compliance with IRS regulations and avoiding penalties.
  • If a plan is classified as top-heavy due to Key Employees, minimum contributions may be required for non-key employees.

Interpreting the Key Employee

The designation of an individual as a Key Employee is primarily a regulatory and compliance interpretation, specifically within the realm of [Retirement Plan Compliance]. It directly impacts whether a company's qualified retirement plans meet nondiscrimination testing requirements. If a significant portion of a plan's assets is attributed to Key Employees, the plan risks being deemed "top-heavy," triggering additional obligations for the employer. This interpretation does not imply a qualitative assessment of an employee's importance to the company's operations outside of this specific tax and benefits context. Instead, it serves as a quantitative measure to ensure equitable benefit distribution across all plan participants.

Hypothetical Example

Consider "Tech Innovations Inc.," a growing startup with a 401(k) plan. Sarah, the CEO, owns 7% of the company's shares. David, the Chief Technology Officer, owns 0.5% of the company but earns an annual salary of $180,000. Maria, a senior software engineer, earns $120,000 annually and owns no shares.

According to current IRS guidelines (which are indexed for inflation annually), Sarah is a Key Employee because she owns more than 5% of the business. David is also a Key Employee because he owns more than 1% and his annual compensation exceeds the statutory threshold (which was $150,000 in recent years). Maria, despite being a highly valued employee, is not a Key Employee because she does not meet either the ownership or the compensation thresholds.

If the aggregate account balances of Sarah and David (the Key Employees) exceed 60% of the total assets in Tech Innovations Inc.'s 401(k) plan, the plan would be considered top-heavy plans. In such a scenario, Tech Innovations Inc. would be required to make minimum contributions to the accounts of non-key employees, like Maria, to maintain compliance with IRS regulations and avoid penalties. This illustrates how the Key Employee designation directly influences plan administration and employer contributions.

Practical Applications

The concept of a Key Employee is primarily applied in the administration and regulation of employer-sponsored retirement plans, ensuring adherence to specific tax laws.

  • Retirement Plan Compliance: Businesses must identify Key Employees annually to perform "top-heavy testing" for their 401(k) plans-plans) and other qualified retirement plans. This ensures that benefits do not disproportionately favor highly compensated individuals.4
  • Minimum Contribution Requirements: If a plan is determined to be top-heavy, employers are generally required to make minimum contributions to the accounts of non-key employees, often a percentage of their compensation.
  • Vesting Schedules: Top-heavy plans may also be subject to accelerated vesting schedules, which can provide non-key employees with quicker access to employer contributions.
  • Fiduciary Responsibilities: Plan administrators and fiduciaries must understand the implications of Key Employee status as part of their fiduciary responsibilities under ERISA, ensuring that plan assets are managed prudently and in compliance with regulatory guidelines.3

Limitations and Criticisms

While the Key Employee classification serves a crucial regulatory purpose in [Retirement Plan Compliance], it has certain limitations. One point of contention is that the definition is purely statutory, based on specific ownership percentages and compensation thresholds, rather than an employee's actual operational importance to a company. An individual who is critical to a company's day-to-day operations or innovation might not be classified as a Key Employee by the IRS if they do not meet the strict financial or ownership criteria.

Furthermore, the need for employers to track and annually assess Key Employee status adds an administrative burden, particularly for smaller businesses or those with complex ownership structures. Misclassification or failure to conduct proper "top-heavy testing" can lead to significant penalties, including plan disqualification, which could result in adverse tax consequences for both the employer and plan participants. While the aim is to ensure equitable benefits for all, some argue that the rigid definitions can sometimes be complex to navigate for plan sponsors.

Key Employee vs. Highly Compensated Employee (HCE)

The terms "Key Employee" and "Highly Compensated Employee (HCE))" are often confused but serve distinct purposes in [Retirement Plan Compliance]. Both classifications are used by the IRS to prevent discrimination in employer-sponsored retirement plans, but they apply to different tests.

A Key Employee is defined for the purpose of "top-heavy" plan testing, which determines if a disproportionate amount of a plan's benefits goes to a small group of high-ranking or high-earning individuals. The criteria for a Key Employee include officers earning above a certain threshold (indexed annually), 5% owners of the business, or 1% owners earning over $150,000 (indexed annually).,2

Conversely, a Highly Compensated Employee (HCE) is defined for general nondiscrimination testing (such as the Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) and Actual Contribution Percentage (ACP) tests) for 401(k) plans-plans). An individual is generally an HCE if they owned more than 5% of the business at any time during the current or preceding plan year, or if they received compensation above a certain threshold (lower than the Key Employee threshold, for example, $135,000 for 2022, indexed annually) in the preceding year.,1

While there can be overlap (a Key Employee might also be an HCE), the definitions and the specific compliance tests they relate to are different. A plan can be non-top-heavy but still fail other nondiscrimination tests if it disproportionately benefits HCEs.

FAQs

What happens if a retirement plan is "top-heavy" because of Key Employees?

If a qualified retirement plans is determined to be "top-heavy," meaning that more than 60% of its aggregate account balances or accrued benefits belong to Key Employee, the employer must take corrective actions. These actions typically involve making minimum contributions to the accounts of non-key employees, usually a percentage of their compensation, and potentially accelerating their vesting schedules. This ensures the plan remains compliant with IRS regulations and avoids disqualification.

Are all highly compensated employees considered Key Employees?

No, not all Highly Compensated Employee (HCE)) are considered Key Employees. While both classifications relate to individuals with higher compensation or ownership, their definitions and the specific IRS tests they apply to are distinct. The salary threshold for an HCE is generally lower than that for a Key Employee, and the ownership criteria also differ. An individual might be an HCE but not meet the criteria to be a Key Employee.

Why is the Key Employee classification important for businesses?

The Key Employee classification is important for businesses primarily for maintaining [Retirement Plan Compliance]. Failure to correctly identify Key Employees and conduct the required "top-heavy" tests can lead to severe penalties from the IRS, including disqualification of the retirement plan. This disqualification can result in adverse tax consequences for both the employer and the plan participants, making accurate classification and annual testing essential for any company sponsoring a retirement plan.