Level of satisfaction

What Is Utility?

In finance and economics, utility refers to the level of satisfaction, happiness, or benefit that an individual derives from consuming a good or service, or from a particular choice or action. It is a fundamental concept within behavioral finance and microeconomics, used to understand and model consumer behavior and decision making under various conditions. Utility is central to predicting how rational agents might make investment decisions or allocate resources to maximize their overall well-being.

History and Origin

The concept of utility has roots in moral philosophy, notably with Jeremy Bentham in the 18th century, who articulated the principle of utility as that which produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Bentham's influential work, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, published in 1789, posited that actions are to be judged by their tendency to increase or diminish happiness.¹², ¹³ In the realm of economics, the idea was further developed and mathematized in the 19th century by economists such as William Stanley Jevons, Carl Menger, and Léon Walras, who applied it to explain consumer choice and value. ¹¹Early applications, such as Daniel Bernoulli's 18th-century analysis of the St. Petersburg Paradox, implicitly recognized the concept of diminishing marginal utility, suggesting that the additional satisfaction from an extra unit of wealth decreases as total wealth increases. ⁹, ¹⁰This laid groundwork for what became known as expected utility theory, which dominated economic analysis of decision-making under risk for much of the 20th century.
⁸

Key Takeaways

• Utility quantifies the satisfaction or benefit derived from economic choices.
• It is a subjective measure, varying significantly from person to person.
• The concept of diminishing marginal utility suggests that each additional unit of a good or service provides less incremental satisfaction than the previous one.
• Utility theory helps explain why individuals make certain financial choices, such as diversifying investments or purchasing insurance.
• While useful for modeling, direct measurement of utility remains a theoretical challenge.

Formula and Calculation

While utility is inherently subjective and not directly observable, economists use mathematical functions to represent it for the purpose of economic models. A simple utility function might be a representation of how an individual's utility changes with wealth ($W$). A common functional form that exhibits diminishing marginal utility is the logarithmic utility function:

$U(W) = \ln(W)$

Where:

• $U(W)$ = Utility derived from wealth $W$
• $\ln$ = Natural logarithm

Another example is the power utility function, often used in contexts involving risk aversion:

$U(W) = \frac{W^{1-\gamma}}{1-\gamma}$

Where:

• $U(W)$ = Utility derived from wealth $W$
• $\gamma$ (gamma) = Coefficient of relative risk aversion ($\gamma > 0$). A higher $\gamma$ indicates greater risk aversion.

These functions allow for the quantitative analysis of preferences and choices, particularly in situations involving uncertain outcomes, where the concept of expected value is extended to expected utility.

Interpreting the Utility

Interpreting utility involves understanding how individuals weigh various outcomes to maximize their overall satisfaction. Because utility is subjective, it cannot be compared across different individuals. Instead, it is used to understand an individual's preferences and choices in isolation. For instance, a person choosing between two investment options might select the one that offers a lower but more certain return over a higher but riskier return, reflecting a preference for a higher expected utility, even if the expected monetary value is lower. This behavior is consistent with risk aversion, where the disutility of a potential loss outweighs the utility of an equivalent gain. The shape of an individual's utility function, particularly its concavity, illustrates their attitude toward risk.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor, Sarah, who has $100,000 and is deciding between two investment options for her financial assets over the next year:

Option A: Low-Risk Bond Fund

• Guaranteed 5% return.
• Final wealth: $105,000.

Option B: High-Risk Stock Fund

• 50% chance of 20% return (final wealth: $120,000).
• 50% chance of -5% return (final wealth: $95,000).

To make her decision, Sarah considers her utility from wealth. If Sarah has a logarithmic utility function, $U(W) = \ln(W)$:

1. Calculate Utility for Option A:
   $U($105,000) = \ln(105,000) \approx 11.561$

2. Calculate Expected Utility for Option B:
   $E[U(W)] = (0.50 \times \ln(120,000)) + (0.50 \times \ln(95,000))$
   $E[U(W)] = (0.50 \times 11.695) + (0.50 \times 11.462)$
   $E[U(W)] = 5.8475 + 5.731 = 11.5785$

In this scenario, Sarah's expected utility from the high-risk stock fund (approximately 11.5785) is slightly higher than the utility from the low-risk bond fund (approximately 11.561). Therefore, a rational investor like Sarah, maximizing utility based on this function, would choose the high-risk stock fund. However, a different utility function or a stronger degree of risk aversion might lead her to choose Option A, demonstrating how utility influences individual choices.

Practical Applications

Utility is a cornerstone in many areas of finance and economics. In portfolio management, understanding an investor's utility function helps in constructing portfolios that align with their risk tolerance and financial goals, often leading to optimal asset allocation. ⁶, ⁷It informs financial planning by providing a framework for analyzing choices related to savings, consumption, insurance, and retirement. Regulators, such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), utilize economic analysis, which implicitly or explicitly considers utility and welfare, when evaluating the costs and benefits of new rules and policies impacting financial markets. The SEC's Division of Economic and Risk Analysis, for example, prepares guidance on economic analysis in rulemaking to assess potential impacts on market efficiency, competition, and capital allocation.
⁵

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its widespread use, traditional utility theory faces several limitations. A primary critique is that utility is unobservable and difficult to quantify, making empirical testing challenging. Critics also point out that human behavior often deviates from the rational maximization assumed by classical utility theory. For instance, people may exhibit inconsistencies in their choices or be influenced by the way information is presented, effects that traditional utility models struggle to explain.

A significant challenge to expected utility theory came with the development of Prospect Theory by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in 1979. ⁴Prospect theory, a key concept in behavioral economics, suggests that individuals evaluate potential outcomes in terms of gains and losses relative to a reference point, rather than in terms of final wealth states. ³It also posits that people are generally risk-averse for gains but risk-seeking for losses, and they tend to overweight small probabilities and underweight moderate and high probabilities. ¹, ²These observed patterns of behavior systematically violate the axioms of expected utility theory, highlighting its descriptive shortcomings.

Utility vs. Prospect Theory

While both utility theory and Prospect Theory aim to explain how individuals make choices under uncertainty, their approaches differ fundamentally.

The key distinction lies in their purpose: utility theory is often used as a normative guide for rational choice, while Prospect Theory offers a more empirically grounded, descriptive account of actual human financial decision-making, acknowledging psychological biases that influence choices.

FAQs

What is the difference between total utility and marginal utility?

Total utility is the overall satisfaction an individual gains from consuming a given quantity of a good or service. Marginal utility is the additional satisfaction or benefit gained from consuming one more unit of that good or service. Typically, as more units are consumed, total utility increases, but marginal utility diminishes.

How does utility relate to risk?

Utility functions can model an individual's attitude towards risk. A concave utility function indicates risk aversion, meaning an individual prefers a certain outcome over a risky one with the same expected value. A convex function indicates risk-seeking behavior, while a linear function indicates risk neutrality.

Can utility be measured?

No, utility cannot be directly measured or observed objectively. It is a theoretical construct used by economists to understand and model preferences. While mathematical functions are used to represent utility, the actual "units" of satisfaction are subjective and vary from person to person.

Why is utility important in financial markets?

Utility is important because it provides a framework for understanding investor behavior and how individuals make investment decisions. It helps financial professionals design products, strategies, and portfolios that align with an investor's unique preferences and risk tolerance, contributing to more effective financial planning and diversification strategies.