Skip to main content
← Back to N Definitions

Nonqualified stock options nsos

What Are Nonqualified Stock Options (NSOs)?

Nonqualified stock options (NSOs), also known as nonstatutory stock options, are a type of employee stock options granted by an employer to an employee, independent contractor, or board member as a form of compensation. Unlike their statutory counterparts, such as incentive stock options (ISOs), NSOs do not receive preferential tax treatment under the Internal Revenue Code. Instead, they are subject to ordinary income tax upon exercise. NSOs are a common component of equity compensation plans and are used to incentivize and retain key personnel by aligning their financial interests with the company's performance.

History and Origin

The use of stock options as a form of employee compensation has a history rooted in the mid-20th century. While stock options technically existed before 1950, their widespread adoption, particularly for executives, surged after the Revenue Act of 1950. This act introduced "restricted stock options" that provided favorable tax treatment upon disposition rather than exercise, making them an attractive incentive, especially given the high income tax rates of the time. During the 1950s, both tax-qualified restricted stock options and nonqualified stock options (NSOs) grew substantially in popularity.17

The concept of stock options then expanded beyond just top executives. For instance, in Silicon Valley, early tech companies like Fairchild Semiconductor and later Intel, recognized the value of offering ownership stakes to a broader range of employees to attract and retain talent in a competitive environment.16,15 This evolution in compensation philosophy helped solidify stock options, including NSOs, as a staple in modern corporate pay structures, encouraging employees to contribute to the company's growth and share in its success.

Key Takeaways

  • Nonqualified stock options (NSOs) are a form of equity compensation that does not qualify for special tax treatment under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
  • The difference between the fair market value of the stock and the exercise price at the time of exercise is taxed as ordinary income.
  • Upon the sale of shares acquired through NSOs, any subsequent gain or loss is treated as a capital gain or capital loss, depending on the holding period.
  • NSOs offer flexibility for companies in terms of design and who can receive them, but they can create a significant tax liability for the recipient.

Formula and Calculation

The taxable income from exercising nonqualified stock options (NSOs) is calculated as the difference between the fair market value (FMV) of the underlying stock on the exercise date and the exercise price (also known as the grant price or strike price). This difference is commonly referred to as the "spread."

The formula for the ordinary income recognized at exercise is:

Ordinary Income=(FMV at ExerciseExercise Price)×Number of Shares Exercised\text{Ordinary Income} = (\text{FMV at Exercise} - \text{Exercise Price}) \times \text{Number of Shares Exercised}

This amount is generally included in an employee's taxable wages and reported on their Form W-2.14,13

Interpreting the NSO

Interpreting nonqualified stock options primarily revolves around understanding their value and tax implications at different stages. Unlike other forms of equity compensation like restricted stock units (RSUs), NSOs become taxable when they are exercised, not when they are granted or vest. The "spread" between the exercise price and the fair market value at the time of exercise is considered ordinary income and is subject to income tax, Social Security, and Medicare taxes.12

The basis of the acquired stock is then adjusted to include the amount of ordinary income recognized. This new basis is crucial for calculating capital gains or losses when the shares are eventually sold. A higher spread at exercise means a higher ordinary income tax event, but also a higher cost basis for future capital gains calculations, potentially reducing future capital gains tax if the stock continues to appreciate. Conversely, if the stock price declines after exercise but before sale, a capital loss could be realized.

Hypothetical Example

Imagine Sarah is granted 1,000 nonqualified stock options by her company on January 1, 2023, with an exercise price of $10 per share. The options have a vesting period of two years, meaning they vest on January 1, 2025.

On January 1, 2025, when the options vest, the company's stock is trading at a fair market value of $25 per share. Sarah decides to exercise all 1,000 options immediately.

  • Shares exercised: 1,000
  • Exercise Price: $10 per share
  • Fair Market Value (FMV) at exercise: $25 per share

Sarah's ordinary income from exercising the NSOs is calculated as:
(( $25 - $10 ) \times 1,000 = $15 \times 1,000 = $15,000)

This $15,000 will be added to Sarah's regular wages and will be subject to ordinary income taxes, as well as Social Security and Medicare taxes, in the year of exercise (2025). Her cost basis for the 1,000 shares will now be $25 per share ($10 exercise price + $15 ordinary income recognized).

If Sarah holds these shares for several months and then sells them on July 1, 2025, for $30 per share, she will also incur a capital gain.
(( $30 - $25 ) \times 1,000 = $5 \times 1,000 = $5,000)

Since she held the shares for less than one year after exercise (January 1 to July 1, 2025), this $5,000 would be considered a short-term capital gain and taxed at her ordinary income tax rate. If she had held them for more than one year, it would be a long-term capital gain, typically taxed at a lower rate.

Practical Applications

Nonqualified stock options are widely used in various facets of finance, particularly within executive compensation and broader employee incentive programs. Companies employ NSOs to attract, retain, and motivate employees across all levels, from entry-level to senior management. They are a flexible tool, allowing companies to tailor compensation packages to specific employees or groups without the stringent IRS rules that apply to statutory options.

From a corporate finance perspective, NSOs can be advantageous because they typically do not require cash outflow from the company at the time of grant. Instead, the company receives cash when employees exercise their options. However, companies must account for the expense of NSOs on their financial statements, generally following guidance from the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Since 2006, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) have required companies to expense stock options, impacting reported earnings.

Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has enacted detailed disclosure requirements regarding stock option grants, especially concerning the timing of awards in relation to the release of material nonpublic information (MNPI). These rules, such as new Item 402(x) of Regulation S-K, mandate narrative and tabular disclosures to enhance transparency in corporate governance and compensation practices.11

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite their widespread use, nonqualified stock options face several limitations and criticisms. A primary concern is the significant tax liability that can arise for employees upon exercise. Since the spread between the exercise price and the fair market value is taxed as ordinary income, employees can incur a substantial tax burden even if they do not immediately sell the underlying shares. This can lead to situations where employees need to sell a portion of the exercised shares to cover the taxes, limiting their long-term ownership.10

From a broader perspective, stock options, including NSOs, have been criticized for potentially encouraging excessive risk-taking by management, as option holders benefit from upside potential without sharing in the downside risk once the stock price falls below the exercise price.9 Some academic literature also suggests that stock options can be an expensive way to deliver compensation to risk-averse employees and may create agency problems within firms.8 The accounting treatment of stock options has also been a contentious issue; prior to mandatory expensing, some argued that not recording options as an expense on the income statement distorted a company's financial performance.7 While current accounting rules require expensing, concerns persist regarding the valuation and impact on reported earnings. An academic review by the American Economic Association further details some of the inherent "troubles" with stock options, including their effectiveness as incentives and the risks they impose on employees.6

Nonqualified Stock Options vs. Incentive Stock Options (ISOs)

Nonqualified stock options (NSOs) and Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) are both forms of employee stock options, but they differ significantly in their tax treatment and regulatory requirements. The primary distinction lies in when and how the income from the option is taxed.

With NSOs, there is generally no tax consequence when the option is granted. The taxable event occurs when the employee exercises the option. At this point, the difference between the fair market value of the stock on the exercise date and the exercise price is taxed as ordinary income, subject to income, Social Security, and Medicare taxes.5 Any subsequent gain or loss upon the sale of the shares is treated as a capital gain or capital loss, depending on the holding period.

In contrast, ISOs offer more favorable tax treatment. For ISOs, employees generally do not incur any regular income tax at either the grant or exercise date. Instead, the entire gain (the difference between the sale price and the exercise price) is taxed as a capital gain when the shares acquired through the ISOs are eventually sold, provided certain holding period requirements are met.4 However, the "spread" at exercise for ISOs may be subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Due to their preferential tax treatment, ISOs are subject to stricter IRS regulations regarding grant limits, holding periods, and shareholder approval. NSOs offer greater flexibility for companies as they are not bound by these stringent rules, making them a common choice for various compensation purposes.

FAQs

When are Nonqualified Stock Options (NSOs) taxed?

NSOs are typically taxed at two points: first, when you exercise the options, and second, when you sell the shares acquired from exercising the options. When you exercise, the difference between the stock's fair market value and your exercise price is taxed as ordinary income. When you sell the stock, any further gain or loss is treated as a capital gain or capital loss.3

How is the ordinary income from NSOs reported for tax purposes?

The ordinary income recognized when you exercise nonqualified stock options is included in your wages and reported on your Form W-2 by your employer. This amount is subject to federal income tax, Social Security tax, and Medicare tax.2

Can I incur a loss with Nonqualified Stock Options (NSOs)?

Yes, it is possible to incur a loss with NSOs. While the ordinary income is recognized at exercise, the value of the stock can fluctuate afterward. If the stock price falls below your cost basis (exercise price plus the ordinary income recognized at exercise) when you eventually sell the shares, you would realize a capital loss. This capital loss may be used to offset other capital gains and, to a limited extent, ordinary income.1

Do NSOs have a vesting period?

Yes, most nonqualified stock options come with a vesting period. This is a predetermined schedule that dictates when an employee gains the right to exercise their options. Options typically vest over time (e.g., over four years) or upon the achievement of specific performance milestones. Until the options vest, they cannot be exercised.

Are NSOs suitable for all employees?

Nonqualified stock options can be a valuable part of a compensation package for many employees, but their suitability depends on individual financial situations and risk tolerance. The potential for a significant tax liability upon exercise means that employees should carefully consider their ability to cover these taxes, especially if they plan to hold the stock rather than immediately sell it. Consulting with a financial advisor is often recommended to understand the personal tax implications.