Post moderne portefeuille theorie

What Is Post-Modern Portfolio Theory?

Post-Modern Portfolio Theory (PMPT) is a methodology for portfolio optimization that refines traditional portfolio analysis by focusing on downside risk, rather than assuming risk is symmetrical. As a sub-category of portfolio theory, PMPT acknowledges that investors are typically more concerned with losses than with gains of equal magnitude. It aims to construct investment portfolios that maximize returns relative to the probability and magnitude of returns falling below a specific target or threshold, known as the Minimum Acceptable Return (MAR) or Desired Target Return (DTR)³³. This approach diverges significantly from earlier models that treat all volatility, whether positive or negative, as equally undesirable.

PMPT incorporates concepts from behavioral finance by recognizing that investor psychology is inherently asymmetric regarding gains and losses. It provides a framework for analyzing portfolios using metrics that differentiate between "good" volatility (returns above the target) and "bad" volatility (returns below the target), offering a more intuitive and realistic measure of risk from an investor's perspective³².

History and Origin

The conceptual underpinnings of Post-Modern Portfolio Theory emerged in the early 1990s as a response to perceived limitations of Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT). While Harry Markowitz's seminal work on MPT, which earned him a Nobel Prize, revolutionized investment management by introducing a quantitative framework for risk and return, it largely relied on the assumption of normally distributed returns and measured risk solely by standard deviation. This implied that upside volatility was as undesirable as downside volatility.

However, real-world financial markets often exhibit non-normal return distributions, characterized by skewness (asymmetric returns) and kurtosis (fatter tails, indicating more extreme events). Frank A. Sortino, along with Robert van der Meer, and later Steven Satchell, were key figures in developing metrics and concepts that directly addressed these limitations³¹. Their work emphasized focusing on the risk of failing to meet a specific investment goal rather than just overall variability. Brian M. Rom and Kathleen W. Ferguson, principals of software developer Investment Technologies, LLC, are credited with coining the term "Post-Modern Portfolio Theory" in their publications in the early 1990s, popularizing these downside-risk algorithms and performance measures for practitioners³⁰. This paved the way for a more nuanced approach to performance measurement that resonated with how investors actually perceive and react to risk.

Key Takeaways

• Post-Modern Portfolio Theory (PMPT) focuses on downside risk, defining risk as the probability and magnitude of returns falling below a specified target, rather than overall volatility.
• PMPT recognizes that actual market returns often exhibit non-normal distributions, with investors having an asymmetric aversion to losses.
• Key metrics in PMPT include the Sortino Ratio and the Omega Ratio, which differentiate between positive and negative deviations from a target return.
• The theory helps construct portfolios that are optimized for wealth accumulation and capital preservation by managing undesirable outcomes more directly.
• PMPT offers a more intuitive framework for risk management, aligning more closely with investor psychology and real-world decision-making.

Formula and Calculation

Unlike Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) which primarily uses standard deviation to quantify risk, Post-Modern Portfolio Theory (PMPT) employs various downside-focused metrics. Two prominent examples are the Sortino Ratio and the Omega Ratio.

Sortino Ratio:
The Sortino Ratio measures the risk-adjusted return of an investment, penalizing only those returns that fall below a specified target return (Minimum Acceptable Return, MAR), rather than penalizing both upside and downside volatility.²⁸, ²⁹

The formula for the Sortino Ratio ((S)) is:
$S = \frac{R_p - T}{DR}$

Where:

• (R_p) = Portfolio's average annual return
• (T) = Target or minimum acceptable return (e.g., risk-free rate, inflation rate, or a specific investor goal)
• (DR) = Downside Deviation (also known as target semideviation), which is the standard deviation of returns below the target return.²⁶, ²⁷

The Downside Deviation is calculated as:
$DR = \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n} \max(0, T - R_i)^2}{n-1}}$
Where:

• (R_i) = Individual return observation
• (T) = Target return
• (n) = Number of observations

Omega Ratio:
The Omega Ratio provides a comprehensive summary of a return distribution, taking into account all moments of the distribution (not just mean and variance). It is defined as the probability-weighted ratio of gains versus losses for a given threshold return target²⁵.

The formula for the Omega Ratio ((\Omega)) is:
$\Omega(\tau) = \frac{\int_{\tau}^{\infty} (1 - F(x)) dx}{\int_{-\infty}^{\tau} F(x) dx}$
Where:

• (\tau) = Threshold return (e.g., the risk-free rate or a target return)
• (F(x)) = Cumulative distribution function of the portfolio returns.²⁴

A simpler interpretation for discrete returns often describes Omega as the area above the threshold return divided by the area below the threshold return²³. A higher Omega ratio (greater than 1) indicates that potential gains outweigh potential losses relative to the threshold²². More details on this can be found in discussions of the Omega Ratio.

Interpreting Post-Modern Portfolio Theory

Interpreting Post-Modern Portfolio Theory involves shifting focus from traditional measures of volatility to specific downside risk metrics. Unlike expected return and standard deviation used in MPT, PMPT’s measures provide a nuanced view of risk that aligns with an investor's true concerns about losing money or failing to meet specific financial objectives.

When applying PMPT, portfolio managers and investors typically assess the Sortino Ratio and Omega Ratio. A higher Sortino Ratio indicates a better risk-adjusted return for a given level of downside risk, meaning the portfolio is generating more return for each unit of "bad" volatility it incurs. ²⁰, ²¹Similarly, an Omega Ratio greater than 1 suggests that the probability-weighted gains exceed probability-weighted losses relative to the chosen target return, indicating a favorable risk-reward profile.
¹⁸, ¹⁹
This interpretation allows for a more tailored approach to portfolio construction, where the objective is not just to minimize overall variance but to explicitly control for unfavorable outcomes. It acknowledges that investors do not perceive upside volatility (returns above expectations) as negatively as downside volatility (returns below expectations). ¹⁷By focusing on returns relative to a specific investor's target, PMPT enables a more personalized and intuitive assessment of an investment strategy's effectiveness in meeting financial goals.

Hypothetical Example

Consider an investor, Sarah, who has a retirement portfolio and a primary goal of achieving a minimum acceptable return (MAR) of 5% annually to cover her living expenses. Sarah is particularly averse to any returns falling below this 5% threshold.

She is evaluating two hypothetical portfolios, Portfolio A and Portfolio B, both with an average annual return of 8%.

Portfolio A (Traditional Approach):

• Average Annual Return: 8%
• Standard Deviation: 12% (indicating overall volatility)

Portfolio B (PMPT Approach):

• Average Annual Return: 8%
• Downside Deviation (below 5% MAR): 4%
• Omega Ratio (at 5% MAR): 1.8

Using a traditional Modern Portfolio Theory lens, both portfolios might seem similar in terms of return, with Portfolio A's overall volatility (12%) potentially making it appear riskier if MPT is the only metric considered. However, under Post-Modern Portfolio Theory, Sarah would focus on metrics that specifically address her concern about downside risk.

Calculating the Sortino Ratio for Portfolio B:
$S = \frac{R_p - T}{DR} = \frac{8\% - 5\%}{4\%} = \frac{3\%}{4\%} = 0.75$

This Sortino Ratio of 0.75 for Portfolio B indicates that for every 1% of downside deviation, the portfolio generated 0.75% return above the 5% MAR. The Omega Ratio of 1.8 further reinforces that the portfolio has 1.8 times more upside potential than downside risk relative to her 5% target.
¹⁶
If Portfolio A had a higher downside deviation than Portfolio B (even if its overall standard deviation was similar), PMPT would suggest that Portfolio B is a better fit for Sarah's objectives because it more effectively manages the risk she cares about most—falling below her 5% MAR. This example highlights how PMPT provides a more direct measure of managing undesirable outcomes, focusing on wealth accumulation while explicitly limiting exposure to significant losses, which aligns with the investor's desire for capital preservation.

Practical Applications

Post-Modern Portfolio Theory finds practical application in several areas of investment management, particularly for investors and institutions whose primary concern is managing downside risk and meeting specific financial obligations.

1. Goal-Based Investing: PMPT is highly relevant for investors with clearly defined financial goals, such as retirement planning, funding education, or ensuring sufficient income streams. By setting a specific Minimum Acceptable Return (MAR) or Desired Target Return (DTR), portfolios can be optimized to maximize the probability of achieving those goals while minimizing the risk of falling short. Th¹⁵is contrasts with MPT's focus on maximizing return for a given level of overall variance.

2. Risk Management and Hedging: Investment managers use PMPT's emphasis on downside risk to refine their risk management strategies. Instead of simply reducing overall volatility, they can implement strategies designed to specifically hedge against negative market movements or portfolio drawdowns. Th¹⁴is is particularly useful for portfolios that need to avoid significant losses to maintain liquidity or meet future liabilities.

3. Alternative Investments and Non-Normal Distributions: Many alternative investments, such as hedge funds or private equity, often exhibit non-normal return distributions (e.g., positive skewness or fatter tails). PMPT's ability to analyze these non-normal distributions using metrics like the Omega Ratio makes it a more suitable framework for evaluating and allocating to such financial assets where standard deviation alone might be misleading.

4¹³. Tailored Client Solutions: Financial advisors can use PMPT to create more personalized asset allocation strategies. By understanding a client's specific risk tolerance for losses and their target returns, advisors can build portfolios that are genuinely aligned with the client's preferences rather than relying on a generalized measure of risk that treats upside and downside volatility equally.

#¹²# Limitations and Criticisms

While Post-Modern Portfolio Theory (PMPT) offers a valuable refinement to traditional portfolio management by focusing on downside risk, it also has its limitations and criticisms.

One primary criticism stems from its increased complexity compared to Modern Portfolio Theory. While MPT uses relatively straightforward calculations based on mean and variance, PMPT requires more sophisticated mathematical tools to compute metrics like the Omega Ratio, which considers the entire distribution of returns below a threshold. Th¹¹is complexity can make it harder for the average investor or even some financial professionals to fully understand and implement.

Another limitation is the subjectivity involved in defining the "Minimum Acceptable Return" (MAR) or "Desired Target Return" (DTR). The choice of this threshold significantly influences the calculated downside risk and subsequent portfolio optimization. Di¹⁰fferent investors will have different MARs, leading to potentially infinite efficient frontiers and making universal comparisons challenging. This investor-specific nature means that a portfolio optimized for one investor's MAR might not be optimal for another, even if their overall risk aversion appears similar.

Furthermore, despite PMPT's attempt to incorporate behavioral aspects, it still relies on historical data to predict future performance. Like MPT, PMPT's effectiveness can be hampered if historical return distributions do not accurately reflect future market conditions. Unexpected market efficiency shifts or extreme events not captured in historical data can render the optimized portfolio less effective. Cr⁸, ⁹itiques of traditional portfolio theory, including its reliance on assumptions about perfectly rational investors and efficient markets, are still relevant to PMPT to some degree, as behavioral biases can still influence investor decisions in ways not fully captured by models.

#⁶, ⁷# Post-Modern Portfolio Theory vs. Modern Portfolio Theory

Post-Modern Portfolio Theory (PMPT) emerged as an evolution of Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT), primarily addressing what proponents considered to be MPT's oversimplifications regarding risk. The core distinction lies in how each theory defines and measures risk.

While Modern Portfolio Theory provides a foundational understanding of diversification and risk-return trade-offs, its symmetric view of risk can be problematic for investors primarily concerned with capital preservation and avoiding losses. PMPT offers a more intuitive and empirically robust framework for many real-world investment scenarios by explicitly focusing on the "bad" kind of volatility that truly impacts investor outcomes.

FAQs

What is the main difference between PMPT and MPT?

The main difference is how they define risk. Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) views risk as overall volatility, measured by standard deviation, treating both positive and negative deviations from the mean as equally undesirable. Post-Modern Portfolio Theory (PMPT), however, defines risk as downside risk—the possibility of returns falling below a specific target or threshold.

Why does PMPT focus on downside risk?

PMPT focuses on downside risk because it recognizes that investors typically have an asymmetric preference for returns: they are usually more concerned about losing money or failing to meet a specific financial goal than about the variability of returns above their target. This aligns with insights from behavioral finance, which observes that investor psychology is more sensitive to losses.

What is the Sortino Ratio used for in PMPT?

The Sortino Ratio is a key metric in PMPT used to measure a portfolio's risk-adjusted return. Unlike the Sharpe Ratio (used in MPT), the Sortino Ratio only penalizes returns that fall below a predetermined minimum acceptable return (MAR). This provides a clearer picture of how well a portfolio generates returns relative to the "bad" volatility, which is the risk of falling short of an investor's goals.

###⁴, ⁵ What is the Omega Ratio in PMPT?
The Omega Ratio is another important PMPT metric that provides a comprehensive view of a portfolio's return distribution. It's calculated as the ratio of the probability-weighted gains above a specific threshold return to the probability-weighted losses below that threshold. An O³mega Ratio greater than 1 indicates that the potential for gains outweighs the potential for losses relative to the chosen target, offering a more complete picture of the risk-reward tradeoff than simple mean-variance analysis.

###¹, ² Is PMPT replacing MPT?
PMPT is generally considered an extension or refinement of MPT, rather than a complete replacement. While MPT provides fundamental concepts like diversification and the efficient frontier, PMPT offers a more nuanced and realistic approach to portfolio construction by explicitly incorporating downside risk and non-normal return distributions. Many practitioners use elements of both theories to build robust investment strategy for clients.