Skip to main content
diversification.com
← Back to B Definitions

Black list

What Is black list?

In the context of global finance, a "black list" primarily refers to a list of jurisdictions identified as having significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism financing, and proliferation financing. These lists are issued by international regulatory bodies, such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), to safeguard the integrity of the global financial system. When a country is placed on such a black list, financial institutions and other regulated entities are typically required to apply enhanced due diligence measures to business relations and transactions involving that jurisdiction, and in the most severe cases, even apply countermeasures. The concept falls under the broader umbrella of financial regulation.

History and Origin

The concept of identifying and penalizing jurisdictions with weak financial controls gained significant traction in the post-9/11 era, as international efforts intensified to combat terrorist financing and money laundering. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an intergovernmental organization established in 1989, became the primary body responsible for setting international standards to prevent these illicit activities. The FATF's "High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action" list is commonly referred to as the "black list." This process began to be enhanced around 2009, with the FATF's International Co-operation Review Group (ICRG) overseeing the identification and monitoring of these countries to ensure compliance with global standards.7,6

Key Takeaways

  • A financial "black list" designates jurisdictions with severe deficiencies in their anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing frameworks.
  • The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) issues the most prominent "black list," formally known as "High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action."
  • Inclusion on the black list necessitates heightened due diligence and potential countermeasures from financial institutions worldwide.
  • The purpose of the black list is to protect the global financial system from illicit financial flows.
  • Compliance with these measures is critical for financial entities to avoid penalties and maintain integrity.

Interpreting the black list

When a country is placed on a financial black list, it signifies that its regulatory and legal frameworks are considered inadequate to prevent illicit financial activities. For entities operating in international finance, interpreting this designation means understanding that transacting with parties in such a jurisdiction carries elevated risk management requirements. Financial institutions must implement enhanced due diligence procedures, which often involve more stringent identity verification, source of funds checks, and ongoing monitoring of transactions. The objective is to mitigate the risks of facilitating money laundering or terrorist financing, thereby protecting their own operations and the broader financial system.

Hypothetical Example

Consider a multinational bank based in New York that has a client wishing to send a significant sum of money to a business entity in a country currently on the financial black list. Upon identifying the destination, the bank's compliance department would flag the transaction. Instead of standard verification, they would initiate enhanced due diligence. This might involve:

  1. Increased Scrutiny of the Client: Requesting detailed documentation on the source of the funds and the purpose of the transaction.
  2. Verification of the Beneficiary: Demanding comprehensive information about the receiving business, its ultimate beneficial owners, and its operational history.
  3. Ongoing Monitoring: Placing the transaction and the client under continuous review for any suspicious activities.
  4. Management Approval: Requiring approval from senior management or a dedicated financial crime unit due to the heightened money laundering risk.

If the bank cannot adequately mitigate the identified risks after applying these enhanced measures, it may choose to refuse the transaction to protect itself from potential regulatory breaches or involvement in financial crime.

Practical Applications

The financial "black list" has direct and significant practical applications across various sectors of the global economy, particularly for institutions involved in international finance. Banks, investment firms, and other financial service providers use these lists as a critical component of their compliance and risk management frameworks. Specifically:

  • Financial Institutions: Banks and other entities are mandated to apply stringent due diligence measures when dealing with countries on the black list. This can include rejecting transactions, terminating business relationships, or implementing special reporting requirements.
  • Trade and Commerce: Companies engaging in international trade must be aware of black-listed countries as transactions may face delays, increased costs, or outright refusal from banks due to heightened scrutiny.
  • Regulatory Enforcement: Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide use the black list as a basis for issuing advisories, implementing targeted sanctions, and enforcing stricter controls on cross-border financial flows to protect their domestic global financial system. For instance, the FATF specifically called on its members to apply enhanced due diligence measures for Myanmar in October 2022 due to a continued lack of progress on its action plan.5

Limitations and Criticisms

While the intention behind the financial black list is to promote global financial security, it also faces certain limitations and criticisms. One major critique is the potential for significant economic disruption to the black-listed jurisdiction. Being on the list can severely impede a country's access to international capital markets, foreign investment, and trade, leading to adverse economic consequences for its citizens.

Critics also point to the potential for political considerations to influence listing decisions, or the perception that the process may disproportionately affect developing nations with fewer resources to implement complex anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing frameworks. Furthermore, while the lists aim to combat financial crime effectively, some argue that illicit actors may simply adapt and find alternative channels, thereby limiting the overall effectiveness of the black list in truly curbing money laundering and terrorist financing activities. Research by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on the effects of FATF grey-listing, while not directly on the black list, highlights how such designations can impact capital flows and sovereign bonds, underscoring the severe economic implications for listed countries.4

black list vs. grey list

The terms "black list" and "grey list" are often used informally to describe different categories of countries identified by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) based on their compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CFT) standards.

The "black list" refers to the FATF's "High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action." These are countries with severe strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regimes. For these nations, the FATF calls on all its members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, to apply countermeasures. As of recent FATF updates, countries like the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), Iran, and Myanmar have been identified in this category.3,2,1

In contrast, the "grey list" formally known as "Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring," comprises countries that are actively working with the FATF to address strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT frameworks. While these countries also have identified weaknesses, they have committed to swiftly resolve them within an agreed timeframe and are subject to increased monitoring by the FATF. Financial institutions are advised to consider these countries in their risk management processes but typically do not face the same stringent requirements as those associated with the black list. The distinction lies in the severity of the deficiencies and the level of international action required; the black list implies a much higher level of risk and a stronger call for protective measures.,

FAQs

What international body issues the main financial black list?

The primary international body that issues a financial "black list" is the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). It designates jurisdictions as "High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action" due to severe deficiencies in their frameworks for combating money laundering and terrorist financing.

What are the consequences for a country on the financial black list?

A country on the financial black list faces significant consequences, including increased scrutiny of its financial transactions, difficulty accessing international financial markets, reduced foreign investment, and potential sanctions or countermeasures imposed by other nations and financial institutions.

How does the financial black list affect individuals and businesses?

Individuals and businesses engaging in transactions with black-listed countries may experience delays, increased administrative burdens, and heightened due diligence requirements from their banks. In some cases, financial institutions may refuse to process transactions or maintain accounts linked to these jurisdictions due to compliance risks.